Poll: Which methylB12 sublingual brands have you tried and found INeffective or no longer effective

Which methylB12 sublingual brands have you tried and found INeffective or no longer effective?

  • Source Naturals

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Natural Factors

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AOR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Life Extension

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Enzymatic Therapy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Superior Source

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thorne Research

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • DaVinci Laboratories

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Protocol for Life Balance

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nutricology

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Messages
10
This poll is meant to be a sibling poll to Poll: Which methyl-B12 sublingual brands have you tried and found effective.

With the original poll alone, we can't see the difference between a brand that hasn't been tried versus a brand that has been tried and found to be ineffective (or less effective than the current gold standard). So I think there could be some utility in having the negative version of the poll: what brands are ineffective.

There has been some discussion about whether Jarrow has changed and is now less effective, see Jarrow-- did it change?.

In this poll, mark Jarrow as being ineffective even if it used to be effective for you, but isn't any longer.
 
Back