SOC
Senior Member
- Messages
- 7,849
I read somewhere, the other day, that good science is to create a hypothesis and then spend the rest of your time trying to disprove it.
That's the way I learned (and did) scientific research.
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of and finding treatments for complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
I read somewhere, the other day, that good science is to create a hypothesis and then spend the rest of your time trying to disprove it.
I read somewhere, the other day, that good science is to create a hypothesis and then spend the rest of your time trying to disprove it.
But the 'recovered' participants reported that they felt 'much better', so that's OK then.
I missed this as I was in hospital. Question: does this justify a charge of scientific fraud?