Exactly. It usually seems to occur when their opponent is dastardly enough to bring facts and logic to the debate (eg, when David Tuller took on that hapless Norwegian chap on twitter).
Would love a link to that.
Exactly. It usually seems to occur when their opponent is dastardly enough to bring facts and logic to the debate (eg, when David Tuller took on that hapless Norwegian chap on twitter).
Would love a link to that.
A Norwegian blogger wrote this blog post after our Norwegian doctor suggested Lightning Process for ME/CFS
https://melivet.com/2016/09/02/embarrassing-vogt/
Unfortunately his views on ME are still common in Norway.Thanks. I ended up reading the Vogt piece this was a response to, and it was truly embarrassing. A shame that thoughtful patients need to spend their time responding to such trash. Good to draw attention to his hypocrisy in the way that he criticises others for using the weak evidence that he now wishes to rely upon.
There are two approaches on how to view ME.
- One considers the diagnosis as a somatic disease, caused by infection or a disease where the immune system is activated in a non-appropriate way (an auto immune disease). The other considers ME as a psychosomatic illness where body and soul are closely intertwined and influence each other. The clinical picture is considered completely genuine, even if the doctor can not find a physiological explanation, says Sulheim.
...
- Our research team considers ME as a psychosomatic illness, and view the body as a whole, explains the paediatrician