Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is clear to see in the blood

Oliver3

Senior Member
Messages
1,032
I agree a spinal tap is not sufficient.
The vast majority have a myriad of problems not just limited to thr brain.
I.e vascular issues, , muscle issues, immune deficiencies, hormonal issues not directly related to the brain ir in feedback loops, collagen issues, leaky gut issues. You really can't say this disease is exclusive to the brain
 

Wishful

Senior Member
Messages
6,419
Location
Alberta
You really can't say this disease is exclusive to the brain
No, but many (most? all?) of the symptoms could be due to brain cells not doing their job properly. Heart failure doesn't kill you; it's the failure of the brain due to lack of blood flow that ends your life. Lack of blood flow, or low oxygen, would be a biomarker for that, but that's far easier to detect than the failure of possibly just a few brain cells whose dysfunction causes serious symptoms elsewhere in the body.

I was going to say "effects" rather than "symptoms", but so far they haven't found any clear markers of physical effects in the body. Some PWME can't get out of bed, but there's no apparent physical cause (muscle metabolism or whatever), but that doesn't rule out a malfunction in the control circuitry in the brain. We don't have the technology to readily identify that sort of malfunction, and it probably wouldn't show up in spinal fluid. One transistor failing in a CPU can crash your computer, but measuring the supply voltage or current isn't going to reveal that (one transistor out of billions, switching at GHz frequency). The marker is there, it's just buried in too much noise to be practical to dig out.

So yes, there might be some physical measurements of collagen, muscles, capillaries, etc, that are due to ME, but it's buried in too much noise and too far removed from the core dysfunction to be useful.

That's why I favour the black box approach: vary some inputs and hopefully find something that causes a reliable response in ME symptoms. If someone had studied my body when I had a reliable way (cuminaldehyde) to switch my PEM off, that might have revealed something. Dynamic abnormalities are much easier to identify than static ones, especially when they are weak abnormalities in a lot of noise, and what's "normal" varies a lot between individuals.
 

Oliver3

Senior Member
Messages
1,032
No, but many (most? all?) of the symptoms could be due to brain cells not doing their job properly. Heart failure doesn't kill you; it's the failure of the brain due to lack of blood flow that ends your life. Lack of blood flow, or low oxygen, would be a biomarker for that, but that's far easier to detect than the failure of possibly just a few brain cells whose dysfunction causes serious symptoms elsewhere in the body.

I was going to say "effects" rather than "symptoms", but so far they haven't found any clear markers of physical effects in the body. Some PWME can't get out of bed, but there's no apparent physical cause (muscle metabolism or whatever), but that doesn't rule out a malfunction in the control circuitry in the brain. We don't have the technology to readily identify that sort of malfunction, and it probably wouldn't show up in spinal fluid. One transistor failing in a CPU can crash your computer, but measuring the supply voltage or current isn't going to reveal that (one transistor out of billions, switching at GHz frequency). The marker is there, it's just buried in too much noise to be practical to dig out.

So yes, there might be some physical measurements of collagen, muscles, capillaries, etc, that are due to ME, but it's buried in too much noise and too far removed from the core dysfunction to be useful.

That's why I favour the black box approach: vary some inputs and hopefully find something that causes a reliable response in ME symptoms. If someone had studied my body when I had a reliable way (cuminaldehyde) to switch my PEM off, that might have revealed something. Dynamic abnormalities are much easier to identify than static ones, especially when they are weak abnormalities in a lot of noise, and what's "normal" varies a lot between individuals.
They're literally looking at muscle metabolism at the moment.
We are built different.
Referring to our bodies as simple machines doesn't cut it as we're massively complex. Is there just one computer in the human body. I doubt that very much. It's a system that's talks to itself all around the body.
Fir example, we don't understand the gut microbiology, the immune system,
Dynamic abnormalities? I don't think it's that simple in m.e.
The core dysfunction is eds anyway but that's going to show up differently in everyone
 

cfs since 1998

Senior Member
Messages
890
No, but many (most? all?) of the symptoms could be due to brain cells not doing their job properly. Heart failure doesn't kill you; it's the failure of the brain due to lack of blood flow that ends your life. Lack of blood flow, or low oxygen, would be a biomarker for that, but that's far easier to detect than the failure of possibly just a few brain cells whose dysfunction causes serious symptoms elsewhere in the body.
Multiple groups have described endothelial dysfunction, neurovascular dysregulation, impaired peripheral oxygen extraction, etc. These things happen in the body not the brain. The only way your conclusion can be supported is by cherry-picking and ignoring the evidence that exists.
 
Back