akrasia
Senior Member
- Messages
- 215
The Corriere della Sera article is a translation of David Tuller's article in the NY Times.
I've posted a comment (you have to register, but that's quick). At the moment they have zero comments published but they are pre-moderating.
I praised them for covering the story and pointed out that it's a huge story because it's a retrovirus and probably in the UK blood supply (both aspects not mentioned in their coverage). I called for UK govt funding and protection of the blood supply, and pointed out that the expert commentary on the PNAS paper (in the journal itself) called for immediate "proof of principle" clinical trials of ARV for ME/CFS.
Let's comment and push them to see the real scope of the story beyond what was in the press release! I recommend that we PRAISE THEM for their coverage (we want them to do it again!) and tell them what a big story it is, and why. I also recommend keeping the messages short so that people will read them.
I am confused... the article from Belgium is mentioning an entire new study. This is another Belgian article about it:
http://knack.rnews.be/nl/actualitei...rmoeidheidssyndroom/article-1194803699656.htm
The article mentions that researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (University in Brussels) together with RED Labs have found the new XMRV virus in the blood of patients from all over Europe. It's a study done by Professor De Meirleir. He is going to present his findings during the NIH workshop 7/8 september. In the article he's also quoted: "It looks like there's going to be an end to the suffering of 17 million CFS/ME patients worldwide" and "Treatment protocols are currently being developed, both in Belgium and abroad." He's also quoted as saying that the footprint that CFS leaves on the immunesystem can be compared to the footprint HIV leaves.
(keep in mind I am not a professional translator
The Independent said they had done an article but it was pulled because there was more important news
the comments on the washington post article are HORRIBLE
Washington Post: Chronic fatigue study points to retrovirus
I think there's no panic because NIH/FDA/HHS or some governmental group of that ilk is deliberately putting a low-key spin on the info. As emotionally satisfying as it would be for PWCs (me, anyway) to see a little alarm in the general populace , we probably don't really want a world-wide panic.
the comments on the washington post article are HORRIBLE
Washington Post: Chronic fatigue study points to retrovirus
Can't remember if anyone provided a link to Bloomberg's coverage of the paper - here it is.
I am confused... the article from Belgium is mentioning an entire new study. This is another Belgian article about it:
http://knack.rnews.be/nl/actualitei...rmoeidheidssyndroom/article-1194803699656.htm
The article mentions that researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (University in Brussels) together with RED Labs have found the new XMRV virus in the blood of patients from all over Europe. It's a study done by Professor De Meirleir. He is going to present his findings during the NIH workshop 7/8 september. In the article he's also quoted: "It looks like there's going to be an end to the suffering of 17 million CFS/ME patients worldwide" and "Treatment protocols are currently being developed, both in Belgium and abroad." He's also quoted as saying that the footprint that CFS leaves on the immunesystem can be compared to the footprint HIV leaves.
(keep in mind I am not a professional translator, but the article is in Dutch and that's my native language, so the translation will not be far off)
Hi Sickofcfs, perhaps it's my "Inner Revolutionary" speaking, but I kind of wouldn't mind at least a little bit of world-wide panic. :Retro wink:
Me neither -- a little bit, anyway. Unfortunately, the governments don't seem to agree with us on this one.
But the Governments aren't reporting it- Journalists are. Some of the articles mention the risk to the Blood Supply, but it doesn't seem to raise many eyebrows. I don't quite get it.
The Independent said they had done an article but it was pulled because there was more important news
i can not find this article. can someone supply the link?
But the Governments aren't reporting it- Journalists are. Some of the articles mention the risk to the Blood Supply, but it doesn't seem to raise many eyebrows.
I don't quite get it.