Hi, Annesse.
The webpage you cited contains the following statements:
"It is likely that most of the negative health effects shown in this study are related to folic acid, more than to vitamin B 12. Health experts have suspected for some time that folic acid may be a "double-edged" sword."
Folic acid is a synthetic form of folate, not found naturally. In the methylation treatments, we favor the natural forms of folate. B12 should not get a "bad rap" because of this study. It was not given except with folic acid.
I agree that it's preferable to get one's essential nutrients from foods. However, I suspect that a lot of the foods sold these days are lacking in sufficient levels of the essential nutrients as a result of "scientific agriculture," which has focused in the past on increasing yields and hence profit, not on nutrition. Not everyone is in a position to grow their own food or to obtain high-quality foods. Also, Prof. Bruce Ames has shown that genetic differences among people result in higher needs for particular nutrients in some people. Furthermore, it is sometimes necessary to use a nutrient at a pharmacological dosage (not available by eating foods) in order to break a vicious circle mechanism. For these reasons, I think that nutritional supplements do have important roles to play. But I don't disagree that the general state of health would be better if people made better food choices.
Best regards,
Rich
The webpage you cited contains the following statements:
"It is likely that most of the negative health effects shown in this study are related to folic acid, more than to vitamin B 12. Health experts have suspected for some time that folic acid may be a "double-edged" sword."
Folic acid is a synthetic form of folate, not found naturally. In the methylation treatments, we favor the natural forms of folate. B12 should not get a "bad rap" because of this study. It was not given except with folic acid.
I agree that it's preferable to get one's essential nutrients from foods. However, I suspect that a lot of the foods sold these days are lacking in sufficient levels of the essential nutrients as a result of "scientific agriculture," which has focused in the past on increasing yields and hence profit, not on nutrition. Not everyone is in a position to grow their own food or to obtain high-quality foods. Also, Prof. Bruce Ames has shown that genetic differences among people result in higher needs for particular nutrients in some people. Furthermore, it is sometimes necessary to use a nutrient at a pharmacological dosage (not available by eating foods) in order to break a vicious circle mechanism. For these reasons, I think that nutritional supplements do have important roles to play. But I don't disagree that the general state of health would be better if people made better food choices.
Best regards,
Rich