Developing Citizen-Scientists
I've been developing the idea - before I got into the PLOS thing - that we need to develop citizen scientists. These are people who are faced with scientific claim that impact on their life. They're either things that they're supposed to do or that their health care providers are supposed to do with them, or that their public health policy sets.
[..]
So the idea of the citizen scientists, it's a person who has learned to trust their basic mathematical and scientific knowledge to make a judgment: do they need to probe an article or find a more trusted source before accepting a claim? And a lot my blogging has been organised around disseminating skills and encouraging skepticism about the claims we all deal with.
I originally was developing this idea around positive psychology coaches but I think now it really applies to people like Tom Kindlon and all the members of the community who are desperately looking to interpret the scientific literature that they have a well based skepticism about the quality of it, the trustworthiness of it.
From: "A Skeptical Look at the PACE Chronic Fatigue Trial"
http://www.mediafire.com/view/n5r9q...look_at_PACE_16_11_2015_edited_transcript.pdf