I do not believe the OMF as a whole is the problem here, I do believe that certain parts and individuals involved with the OMF should overthink the way they communicate though.
I am sure those individuals think it is best for the cause in how they do what they do, but there are some very significant communication issues, uselessly hyped up stories that too often turn into dust, which in itself would be a normal process in science, the problem is the usual hype up first and do not follow up later process, this is often NOT necessary but is clearly used as leverage "to give people hope" (which in my mind can never be the case if it is not 100% honest) and to keep them engaged, this is very clearly a problem for many.
There will of course be some angry self righteous rebuttal, some explanations, we had this before.
After all, I believe in the grand matter of schemes it is good that we have those people in the OMF but it would clearly be BETTER if they were to work on their communications and stop playing withh people's minds and hopes. Again they probably think it is the best way to do it, I doubt that this correct to be honest, there are better ways.
Please forget the nano needle by the way, it is not the NIH's fault, not everything is, a lot, but not everything.