Lotus97
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,041
- Location
- United States
One other thing about questioning other people's theories in regards to clinical data/working with patients. While I have no doubt that Dr. Yasko has worked with countless individuals, Rich was also involved in a methylation study with Dr. Nathan's CFS/ME patients where they tested everyone's SNPs and also ran everyone's methylation pathyways panel at 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months.
http://www.mecfs-vic.org.au/sites/w...Article-2009VanKonynenburg-TrtMethylStudy.pdf
I'm sure Rich has worked with doctors and individuals since the study. While it's true that Yasko probably worked with more people than Rich, Rich did work specifically with people with CFS/ME and he concluded that SNP testing wasn't always an accurate predictor of how a person would respond to methylation. This is from August 2012:
(I think this was before 23andme lowered their price to $99. Maybe he would have the same answer, but the methylation pathways panel costs $299 which is why I mention it)
http://www.mecfs-vic.org.au/sites/w...Article-2009VanKonynenburg-TrtMethylStudy.pdf
I'm sure Rich has worked with doctors and individuals since the study. While it's true that Yasko probably worked with more people than Rich, Rich did work specifically with people with CFS/ME and he concluded that SNP testing wasn't always an accurate predictor of how a person would respond to methylation. This is from August 2012:
(I think this was before 23andme lowered their price to $99. Maybe he would have the same answer, but the methylation pathways panel costs $299 which is why I mention it)
My approach in recent years has been to suggest the simplified protocol for everyone, regardless of SNPs, and then try to deal with whatever issues arise. Many people do not have the finances to afford the nutrigenomic panel, and prefer just to try the treatment. Sometimes this pays off. Other times, more work is needed.
If people have the resources to run one test, I prefer the Health Diagnostics methylation pathways panel.
When I see the results of the Health Diagnostics methylation pathways panel on someone who has also run the nutrigenomic panel, the results in the biochemistry don't always match what one might expect on the basis of the SNPs. I prefer to go with the actual biochemistry. The SNPs are helpful for showing tendencies, but they aren't always very predictive.
Best regards,
Rich