but you might also consider checking peer-reviewed sources to verify any claims before you spend thousands of dollars on anti-emf gear or decide on a career of blowing up 5G towers...or drive yourselves sick from fear of nothing.
Do you know that there are already hidden mobile transmitter in cities with most no warning signs like in hydrants? Do you know that you should never stand next to it (says the producer)?
Do you know that technicians are switching of mobile transmitters before they do maintenance?
If you really think that Wi-Fi has no effect to you could do a trip and camp next to this hydrant or the shafts (Bern, Switzerland).
Do you know that german roofer are warned by their insurance to measure HF because there could be a transmitter e. g. on the neighbours house masked as a chimney?
It is the same problem as with ME: people think if that would be a dangerous disease there would be research and people in hospitals and not at home...
People don't know how EMF works, but think it is safe because it is not forbidden.
Like pesticides.
Like vaccines (who knows that they are produced in cells of aborted human fetus?).
The radiated power from all these groundstations and satellites is infinitesimally low compared to the energy coming through the atmosphere from the sun. There's no evidence this could be real. If there was appreciable energy being broadcast by WiFi, cell towers, comm satellites, etc, then this startup would actually have worked.
This is nonsense.
You can't compare sun radiation with man-made low frequency (khz to gighartz) radiation.
We wouldn't be able to transmit data in approx. 0,8-2,7 GHz if the sun would put terawatts of power in this frequency to the ground.
The nature is not using this frequencies. You can measure it if you don't believe me.
Is the nature dumb?
tried various EMF therapies several years ago, grounding using sockets as well as some necklace stuff, didn't do anything for me
This does not shield the EMF.
To protect you from man-made EMF (77 khz to approx. 5 GHz) you need a very fine net (faraday cage).
For example: you can protect yourself from 800 MHz with a approx. 37 cm thick wall.
To protect you from 2 GHz (wafelength 15 cm) you need a net with mesh size of only a few millimeter.
To shield very low frequencies like 50/60 hz you need a metallic sheath around the electricity cable.
I've always been a bit uneasy about the possible effects of near-constant exposure to wireless technology. I wonder if all the physical effects are fully known.
See this for example:
http://kompetenzinitiative.net/KIT/...erg-and-Hallstadt-Documentation-2006-2016.pdf
(photos of dying trees due to HF transmitters)
There is even a better alternative to Wi-Fi, it is called Li-Fi by its developer (german researcher):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Fi
Apple is already experimenting with it:
https://appleinsider.com/articles/1...-based-li-fi-wireless-data-for-future-iphones
It offers more than 100 times faster data transmitting (not yet, but soon) than conventional wi-fi due to the much bigger spectrum of light.
Who really cares, should millions of people die every year from EMF? As long as I'm not, I don't care...