andyguitar
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,717
- Location
- South east England
By first glance it looks a bit unbelievable, but if you read it this way...Hard to believe the study results though, that this herbal formula can get 98 out of 134 ME/CFS patients back to work or school.
But returning to school or work might not mean a total cure.By first glance it looks a bit unbelievable, but if you read it this way...
Looks good.
Ah, but the Japanese will say China is using it's ideas! And Korea will say "We started it all"!so thats the Japanese, using the ancient Chinese formula!!
Japanese will say China is using it's ideas
Korea will say "We started it all"!
Ah, but the Japanese will say China is using it's ideas! And Korea will say "We started it all"!
But returning to school or work might not mean a total cure.
I was recently informed by an Italian ME/CFS patient that the Italian ozone researcher Umberto Tirelli uses this dubious practice: his studies are done mostly on very mild patients without cognitive impairment (who may not even have ME/CFS).
They then get a high success rate, because chronic fatigue may be easier to treat than true ME/CFS.
I was thinking that perhaps they were diagnosed based on the Fukuda criteria and therefore the the group could have a lot of people with ME/CFS-like illnesses (As PEM is not mandatory in Fukuda). However, it looks like Fukuda criteria was only published couple years after the herbal treatment study.Hard to believe the study results though, that this herbal formula can get 98 out of 134 ME/CFS patients back to work or school.
I was thinking that perhaps they were diagnosed based on the Fukuda criteria and therefore the the group could have a lot of people with ME/CFS-like illnesses
I can see the merit of this approach, but I also want to know what are the potential harms before starting a treatment. I don't have unlimited funds to spend on herbal medications or other supplements. And that's setting aside any side effects from the treatments themselves that may be harmful.However, I think it is worth trying these therapies; my philosophy is that it's better to try something rather than not try, as you never whether something might help unless you try it.
I can see the merit of this approach, but I also want to know what are the potential harms before starting a treatment. I don't have unlimited funds to spend on herbal medications or other supplements. And that's setting aside any side effects from the treatments themselves that may be harmful.
That was me for decades. Mild. Worked full time. Did not have major PEM events or neurological issues that were so intense. I didn't have cognitive impairments.
Taking into account the fact that those with me/cfs can have a bad reaction to almost anything, any treatment is going to come with a risk. Starting with a small dose (say 25% of the recommended dose) might reduce the risk.I can see the merit of this approach, but I also want to know what are the potential harms before starting a treatment. I don't have unlimited funds to spend on herbal medications or other supplements.
Taking into account the fact that those with me/cfs can have a bad reaction to almost anything, any treatment is going to come with a risk. Starting with a small dose (say 25% of the recommended dose) might reduce the risk.
THIS.