percyval577
nucleus caudatus et al
- Messages
- 1,310
- Location
- Ik waak up
Yes, and the OMF has come up with some findings in genes, there also has been findings by other researchers If I´m remembering right. Also here on the forum I think was some interesting poll or something like that, don´t know how reliable it would be. (Also an epigentic change from parents or grandparents would be thinkable, more difficult then to follow.)
A very interesting hint are the cfs outbreaks. Here 50% of people recover (as opposite to ten times less in endemic cases). Obviously there is some strength in outbreaks, therefore a lot of people got ill, but the genetic predisposition should be less imprortant. Also just therefore, probably, a lot of people recover.
So the urgent questions are:
-- which pathways could be disregulated by genetic predispositions? (this wont be an answere too easy, I guess)
-- which influences have helped 50% of epidemic cases to get out of the state?
This could be applied in a forced manner to some of the 95% of endemic cases and to some of the other 50% of epidemic cases, implicating:
The generel question is:
-- which pathway(s) would have gotten affected by the trigger? Maybe there are often two triggers (this also would be a good explanation for cfs outbreaks). In my case I know two triggers and the one pathway which has gotten altered, two times (with 25 years in between).
Then also:
-- why do we see outbreaks from enterovirus, but not from herpesvirus (if I believe what Hip recently said)?
-- why these triggers, so far known? What do they have in common? Herpesviruses will influences the arginine homeostasis to some extent (the levels in the blood during acute infection, I guess). What´s about enteroviruses? What´s about chemicals (the answeres get more difficult, I guess).
This must be looked at (next to the pem thing), what has become altered? What are the properties of the impact?
Then an influence by diet (maybe it is needed/helpful to produce extra mixtures) might well be a cure.
(I think this is in generel a new approach to some diseases, only one needed to know ...)
Sometimes I guess that the influence for reversing our infectional impact (and this probably will be the first influence needed) is to do something less to the body. It might be not conclusive:
-- An impact could take something out of the blood or tissue, resulting in counterrelease, with higher levels.
-- An impact could take something out of the blood or tissue, resulting in a deficiency for some time (only).
-- An impact could also add something to the blood or tissue for some time (only).
I think the question will not be if there is (in the chronic phase) too much or too less of something,
but if there will be needed a more or less unusual level of something
for reversing the impact.
A very interesting hint are the cfs outbreaks. Here 50% of people recover (as opposite to ten times less in endemic cases). Obviously there is some strength in outbreaks, therefore a lot of people got ill, but the genetic predisposition should be less imprortant. Also just therefore, probably, a lot of people recover.
So the urgent questions are:
-- which pathways could be disregulated by genetic predispositions? (this wont be an answere too easy, I guess)
-- which influences have helped 50% of epidemic cases to get out of the state?
This could be applied in a forced manner to some of the 95% of endemic cases and to some of the other 50% of epidemic cases, implicating:
The generel question is:
-- which pathway(s) would have gotten affected by the trigger? Maybe there are often two triggers (this also would be a good explanation for cfs outbreaks). In my case I know two triggers and the one pathway which has gotten altered, two times (with 25 years in between).
Then also:
-- why do we see outbreaks from enterovirus, but not from herpesvirus (if I believe what Hip recently said)?
-- why these triggers, so far known? What do they have in common? Herpesviruses will influences the arginine homeostasis to some extent (the levels in the blood during acute infection, I guess). What´s about enteroviruses? What´s about chemicals (the answeres get more difficult, I guess).
This must be looked at (next to the pem thing), what has become altered? What are the properties of the impact?
Then an influence by diet (maybe it is needed/helpful to produce extra mixtures) might well be a cure.
(I think this is in generel a new approach to some diseases, only one needed to know ...)
Sometimes I guess that the influence for reversing our infectional impact (and this probably will be the first influence needed) is to do something less to the body. It might be not conclusive:
-- An impact could take something out of the blood or tissue, resulting in counterrelease, with higher levels.
-- An impact could take something out of the blood or tissue, resulting in a deficiency for some time (only).
-- An impact could also add something to the blood or tissue for some time (only).
I think the question will not be if there is (in the chronic phase) too much or too less of something,
but if there will be needed a more or less unusual level of something
for reversing the impact.
Last edited: