Hip
Senior Member
- Messages
- 18,238
How do you determine if your gene is dominant or recessive?
This is what I would like know myself.
How do you determine if your gene is dominant or recessive?
Hi everyone, here is what I took re: supp wise:
a) Once I read Yasko's info re: ammonia buildup I immediately planned on doing charcoal detox. I happened to have some bulk activated charcoal on hand, so I just put about 1/8 teaspoon in a gelatin capsule and took it. Within a few hours it was amazing. My cognition started to clear, and I had emotions (increased creativity, happiness, peacefulness) start to arise that I haven't experienced since I got sick 7 years ago! It sounds fairy-tale-ish, I know, but it was rather remarkable. I repeated this once per day for several days, and my cognition continued to get more clear, and I had more and more of these balanced emotional experiences. I did do for say 3 days in a row, and have done this I would say a total of 3 times.
b) I started taking magnesium citrate 300 mg, on the evenings of the days that I was taking the charcoal before bed. This helped me have a good movement the next am to help keep the charcoal moving through, as charcoal from what I experienced, and researched can be constipating.
This is what I would like know myself.
I have used charcoal plenty in the past and it does a good job at pulling toxins out of the bowel from what I can tell as well as some beneficial things (B3 is produced in the gut as well as T4). When I saw her recommendation of one or 2 capsules followed by a bottle of magnesium citrate I was curious.
So 1 or 2 caps seemed like barely enough for a flush. I was wondering why the mag-citrate then you mentioned constipation and that's got to be why. I don't think that's enough charcoal to cause constipation is most people.
I would think a small but steady flow of charcoal throughout the day 2 hours away from food (maybe in between meals) maybe like 1/2 capsule per would keep grabbing the gut toxins as they are produced while not robbing too much of the beneficial things.
No. The steroid saponins in Yucca were too hard for my adrenals.I wanted to ask if you were using Yucca at all? I didn't see that you mentioned it?
What did you want to know? My eyes may be failing me, but I don't see you have SHMT, or ACAT mutations in your signature list. I do however see you have COMT listed. This is strongly related to CBS mutations and affects the dopamine pathway (= energy/motivation), and as well I see you have a MAO mutation listed, which affects serotonin. As well the MTRR mutations could indicate difficulties with B12, and your BMHT mutations could as well really interfere with methylation. See Yasko below:Also if anyone can eloborate on this. Yasko mentions things like: "SHMT+ and ACAT + " and "
COMT V158M + or VDR Taq – SNPs"...
Yes. And this is what I do too. As we cannot be entirely sure of the difference in expression between +/+ and +/-, I have been doing the same too.Is she lumping +/+ and +/- together as +?
No. The steroid saponins in Yucca were too hard for my adrenals.
I do however see you have COMT listed. This is strongly related to CBS mutations and affects the dopamine pathway (= energy/motivation), and as well I see you have a MAO mutation listed, which affects serotonin. As well the MTRR mutations could indicate difficulties with B12, and your BMHT mutations could as well really interfere with methylation.
sregan
Looks like you are well on your way to figuring out the complex interactions of your snps. I'll be better able to help others once I get my own 23andme results back & we can compare snps![]()
What would be most helpful is some clarification of the snps that people are putting in their signatures. From what I can tell the red ones are ones that were identified as being the most problematic in your testing, and then the ones in black are other mutations that you have? I haven't gotten my results back, but do they indicate if they are homogenous or heterogeneous or not? The main one I get confused with is how people are listing their VDR statuses... any clarification you could provide me would be awesome. It's funny, all I ever wanted to be was a poet, and now I am becoming an expert geneticist, naturopath, and physician in order to get myself healthy. Bahabahabaha! Ah well, if it can benefit some people then I guess it may be worth it in the end.
S![]()
Looking at CBS / Transsulfuration pathway, I see that Cysteine and KG (p.s. - what is KG?) break down into
Taurine Sulfite and Glutathione. When upregulated, there is greater production.
My question is, if there is a greater production of Taurine and Sulfite, why is there also not a greater production of
Glutathione? Why is glutathione depleted by CBS up-regulation?
I'm assuming if the "gate" was not open (upregulation) then more of homocysteine would be directed to glutathinone/glutathione production.CBS (cystathionine-beta-synthase): regulates the enzymes that help to convert homocysteine into glutathione...With this upregulation, the “gate” is always open, sending all of the nutritional support used in this program
down a road that does not lead to glutathinone but instead depletes the rest of the cycle instead of being directed to produce glutathione,.
The transsulfuration pathway generates both glutathione and taurine. The cysteine level will determine which one is produced. Low cysteine levels favor glutathione synthesis. High cysteine levels lead to taurine synthesis. A CBS upregulation (C699T + or A360A +) generates cysteine so high that the pathway is shunted toward taurine formation.
dbkita actually did post about the CBS A360A vs. C699T issue. This is what he told someone who was CBS A360A:dbkita knows more about this than I do, and I certainly don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but it's my understanding that it's the CBS A360A polymorphism that is the one where folks might have issues with sulfur, not the C699T.
But you have CBS A360A rather than C699T and what he told you sounds like a contradiction to what I'm quoting above (unless I'm reading this incorrectly)The CBS homozygote you list in you signature is the A360A +/+. That is not the C699T mutation that is correlated with increased trans-sulfuration flux (which is only a 10-15% bump anyways, the 10x upregulation is a faulty meme perpetuated by the Yasko followers that is simply wrong). Dr Yasko is to my knowledge the only one that sees A360A relevance to clinical observations and I am pretty sure she considers A360A to be the much less severe of the two. If I am wrong in that regard then she and her camp are about the only ones on the planet who do.
You are homozygous CBS A360A. You are wild type for the other more important SNP. Even Dr Yasko herself downplays the A360A from what I have seen in sample reports when it is by itself. To my knowledge her and other in her camp and those like Dr Roberts are the only ones who even think A360A has any relevance and they do so without consideration of the overall haplotype. I personally think treating a A360A heterozygote is very peculiar.
If you want the likeliest scientific rationale, then I would suggest focusing on MTHFR gene and proper methylation. Your SHMT is heterozygote like almost 40% of Americans and your CBS is A360A. Big whoop imo.
However, to make sure for CBS there is no harm in getting your serum and urine taurine levels, serum ammonia (urine ammonia levels is borderline quackery sorry), and test urine sulfates with test strips. If those variables are in bounds then trans-sulfuration flux is not a big deal. If not, then it is something to address but honestly it is not the SNPs that have been tested and observed. It is either others we do not know about or epigenetic factors. My point is if you are worried about CBS being out of control, which is not impossible then do the tests to verify it. On the other hand the 10x upregulation meme perpetuated by Dr Yasko and her followers is an absolute colossal error. So don't let that scare you.
You do have as cbs upregulation and several heterozygotes in bhmt. So some bhmt stimulation is needed to prevent overflow down the transsulfuration pathway. But it may be question of amounts. Usibg dmg with a cbs mutation would seem ill advised. But overstimulation will ramp ne relative to da so be careful. P5p / b6 can really up the cbs flow so watch out for that also.
I would suggest using urine sulfate strips to see where your transsulfuration flow is at.
There is no absolute. Yes too much BHMT could stifle some of the main thoroughfare. But setting an absolute amount is not possible since it depends on the person's health status and genes. I think the NE increase from overstimulation is a stricter earlier constraint than lowering the methionine synthase activity. But if you are CBS +/+ and have BHMT issues I think you have to do something. Increased methionine synthase activity will simply drain down the trans-sulfuration pathway. Making you worse off. So there is a balance.
AHCY 1,2,19 (S adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase): These gene byproducts
promote activity through the portion of the pathway that goes
from methionine to homocysteine, effecting levels of homocysteine and
ammonia. Therefore, the AHCY mutations will limit those activities,
and may partially mitigate the effects of CBS upregulations, such that
taurine levels remain moderate rather than elevated.