This really reflects how I feel. We're basically caught with the 'half a loaf' or quarter or 1/8 loaf approach and these things do help - particularly as he noted the wired and tired group or stressed group - which I fit into - but which, for me, only work so long as I stay within my limited confines....walk a bit too far - and I'm back in the soup; stay within my energy envelope and they help. This is quality of life stuff and QOL is important.Everything he is saying here is why, in my opinion, the Gupta Program is effective. And it is also why people do not seem to get cured by Gupta- this meditative, balancing, positive lifestyle approach is effective for ANY chronic illness. The fact that these drastic measures do not cure the condition clearly indicates that the origin is not solely rooted in an unbalanced lifestyle.
I would be very, very (very) surprised if he thought emotions are the cause of CFS. He is, after all a psychologist who would presumably notice if he was having some strong emotional problems. I think he's clear, though, that once you have ME/CFS - that negative emotions impact it -which fits with my experience - and the flip side, which is not really recognized, that positive emotions can provide some relief.I wish he would have elaborated on whether he believes that emotions are the cause of CFS.
It sounds like a) he has not worked with many people who are homebound as you suggested - ie he is working with a higher functioning group and b) that the results with really severely affected people are limited - he says 'some' people do improve and, of those that do, they show 'modest' improvement in functioning...I have worked with some people who are homebound. And the results are mixed. With some, quality of life is improved, but their ability to function is only modestly improved. Actually, those who are most stressed seem to do better, because the stress itself can usually be effectively managed and as that happens, their physical abilities may strengthen.
Cort - Great Interview!!! I thought your questions were well thought out. I could see his thinking and believe it can help, but not cure, as he says.
Also, he keeps referring to managing stress in our lives. Some of our stress is not coming from us, but in our lives. The loss of my husband this summer is an example. I have no control over this and I am sure it is affecting my health. Others have their own stressors that are not in their control.
It takes great fortitude to manage the natural ups and downs of this disease and maintain a joyful outlook on life. While it is very helpful to meditate, pray, etc., it doesn't take care of the viruses, etc. that are plaguing our bodies. They are still there, just like HIV, cancer and heart disease patients. I do believe in having as positive of an attitude as possible, but so far for me, it has not allowed me to play volleyball or even come close.
Gotta make clear that this interview was pre-XMRV; I have no idea how he feels about XMRV's prospects for curing or helping CFS. My guess is that he was excited as the rest of us - I don't know why he wouldn't be.
This is a 2006 book. When was the interview?
This book sounds like it might be very helpful for those who are pushing too hard, trying to live beyond their physical ability. But for some of us who can't even imagine sitting up in a chair watching people play volleyball or being able to focus even 5 minutes to meditate or pray, it feels like another "you can control what's happening to you" lecture. When you don't have the breath to talk, being social isn't much of an option. I hope this doesn't sound too negative- we are all at different places and need different things. It just makes me feel further like an alien when I hear that if I just did a,b, or c, I could get better.![]()
Where does he say 'if you just think happy, happy, happy, joy, joy thoughts and you pace yourself, you too can be cured".Caledonia- To me, it sounds like he's saying, if you just think happy, happy, joy, joy thoughts and you pace yourself, you too can be cured. Doesn't work that way for those of us who have this severe. We have tried meditation, biofeedback, pacing, you name it, we've done it. Doesn't work. There is a biomedical reason we are sick and it cannot be cured with happy, happy, joy, joy thinking. Yes, your quality of life can improve if you don't push it. But that's about it.
Not hereSo I ask people if they’re willing to accept half a loaf, if full recovery is not possible now. I think the more flexible you are about how well you need to be, the greater the chances of finding a path to improvement—through your own personal efforts.
Here's more about quality of life. Where is the promise of a cure? Maybe it's hereIf these thoughts are challenged (even for a few minutes a day) with logical coping statements as you’ve stated, the guilt-producing thoughts will lose their power to upset and stress the individual. When stressful emotions are purged, quality of life improves and the burdens of being ill are eased.
Nope - not there..25 percenters???This is not easy and at one point you state that “I sincerely wish that I had a quick and effective solution. But it doesn’t exist right now”. Do you see a quick and effective solution for ME/CFS/FM appearing anytime soon?
No I don’t see a quick solution to these illnesses right now. My guess is that any new effective treatment will require lifestyle adjustments to get the best result. This is what you have with any number of chronic conditions. For instance, medical treatment for heart disease still requires healthy habits to get the best outcomes.
Here?And the results are mixed. With some, quality of life is improved, but their ability to function is only modestly improved.
He's not talking about a cure - he's talking about improving ones quality of life in the absence of a cure. He is making the claim that there definitely are things you can do to increase your quality of life and they don't only involve pacing.So you make do with good illness management where stressors, obligations, and other pressures are more or less unavoidable. Still, you can learn to function and feel better.
At least for me it does help my quality of life to consciously redirect my thoughts away from resentful, angry worrisome thoughts -
That kind of constructive re-altering of the way I think - or at least the direction that I think in - is something that's rarely done outside of spiritual practices and, so far, as I can tell - is actually at the core of spiritual practices.
I worry about that being devolved or mixed up with the idea of a 'cure'.
In FM, I see more suppressed anger. With ME/CFS, the anger is verbalized more easily. Also, in FM, the caretaking, people pleasing behaviors, and the level of self-sacrifice seems to be greater.
Apart from the common sense provided, this is mostly a non-solution.
I agree that managing activity and rest levels more effectively within ones "energy envelope" (a term from Dr Jason's recent paper) will provide some relief from symptoms and allow for slightly higher activity levels. But this does not result in major changes in underlying physiology and the effects can be quite disappointing for those with a small "energy envelope" to start with.
Secondly, there is little objective evidence to suggest that stress is a major factor in maintaining or increasing the severity of CFS symptoms. The problem with these studies is they are (a) based on anecdote or questionnaires (questionnaires are inherently nonspecific) or (b) poorly controlled for factors known to impact stress response, such as employment and waking time. In fact the evidence suggests the opposite - lower expression of salivary (or UFC, for that matter), is found in healthy patients on days of leisure and presumably more so during vacation time. This suggests, that patients, at least those in the studies are already adopting low-stress lifestyles.
I suggest this is due to the fact that the CFS patients in question have greater functional disabilities than the FM patients.
"This is another critical point. You can definitely improve with lifestyle change, not just cope in a defensive way with unpredictable fluctuations in your illness. I think it is possible to approach near-recovery or wellness by arranging your life so that you allow yourself the time for adequate rest, relaxation and sleep, positive low effort experiences, full expression of emotions, and good social support. Almost anyone who follows these lifestyle guidelines can improve noticeably and sometimes very substantially. "
I agree with the others that he is targeting high functioning patients.
Instead of running which he used to do before the illness, now he can only play volleyball. Are you kidding? If I could play volleyball I
would consider myself cured!
With the above mentioned statement, he is saying that what I am doing right now, should result in remarkably positive outcomes.
I must be doing something wrong in that this doesn't work for me. (my Fault?)
I think, Cort, that your interview was excellent and maybe people who are mildly affected by this illness may achieve success with
what he promotes.(although there's nothing new here that we haven't heard before.
For the critical patients, it's an insult. There is nothing we can do but rest and pace. Our bodies won't allow more. Just wishing the illness away
doesn't work. I did a trial of 1 and it didn't work.
Personal experience suggests to me that stress is a very important part of CFS. That's for me, and may not apply to other people but it's really clear to me that my system is really easily perturbed by even small stresses;
How does the immune problem connect with the 'stress abnormalities'. Actually it lines up very easily in CFS. Both axes of the stress response: the HPA axis and the autonomic nervous system regulate the immune response and the abnormalities in both tend would tend to push the immune system to Th2 functioning - which is exactly what we see in CFS.
This is not to say that CFS IS a stress response-immune (ie an NEID) disorder but it's in there; how much of a role it plays only time and research will tell.
I don't think he means to be insulting to the lower functioning patients.