alex3619
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,810
- Location
- Logan, Queensland, Australia
What is the bet he first gave the reporter a complex technical answer, and then the reporter asked him to dumb it down?
I'll bet you're right!What is the bet he first gave the reporter a complex technical answer, and then the reporter asked him to dumb it down?
What is the bet he first gave the reporter a complex technical answer, and then the reporter asked him to dumb it down?
He probably is referring to viral latency, but most of us understand about that and don't need to be told the virus is "going to sleep". And scientists don't usually describe the results of their work as "miraculous".
I suppose he's using marketing language instead of scientific language. Advertising tends to aim at the lowest common denominator and be content-light. We need the science, not the advert. I guess we'll have to wait for the official scientific release for that.
Can you say why you think this?It appears the november press release will be much more than just the trail results. There might also be more insight into the cause and other factors of the disease.
One of my friend is getting treated by him .. he shared this info.Can you say why you think this?
Thanks Wally, that's very interesting.
Unfortunately it seems that they need to find $50m-$100m for a phase 3 trial now!
That's what I was wondering. ME/CFS isn't specifically mentioned in the article, and I'm wondering why. Perhaps they are clever and realise that it's so much easier to attract funding if you don't mention ME/CFS? (i.e. it's impossible to get large amounts of funding if you mention ME/CFS!)So are they looking specifically at ME/CFS as well or is it just Fibro and IBS?