SpecialK82
Ohio, USA
- Messages
- 993
- Location
- Ohio, USA
We'll see about that...
LOL, I'm ready
We'll see about that...
LOL, I'm ready
Actually that eminent psychiatrist wasn't voicing that as his opinion, but claiming it was the opinion of the others, and that he disagreed with it. That said, he's one of the nastier sort who claim to want to protect the patients while spinning psychological research to support his theories and ignoring the biological research. But it's still important to attribute quotes in an appropriate context - they give us enough legitimate outrageous quotes that we really don't need to take any of them out of context
If I recall correctly, it was Peter White who keeps getting quoted out of context on that one ("the undeserving sick" or some such). Definitely one of the big names in the UK BPS scene anyhow.Which psychiatrist are you referring to?
Must admit I had hoped that Sharpe, who called us " the undeserving sick of our society and our health service.” had retired.
He didn't say that we should be considered the undeserving sick, he was using that term to make another point. He is a dick, just not for that!
Esther, Sharpe said this of ME/ CFS patients in 1999:
How have these doctors, who harm us so badly, got away for all these years with ignoring the fact that our illness is classified as neurological? It is monstrous.“Those who cannot be fitted into a scheme of objective bodily illness yet refuse to be placed into and accept the stigma of mental illness remain the undeserving sick of our society and our health service
Re the Sharpe quotation, here's the horse's mouth, so to speak. To be fair to Sharpe, the very blunt sentence has to be read in context. He did NOT suggest that PWCFS are 'the undeserving sick'.
Of course his basic stance is nonsense but if you're going to accuse him, accuse him for the right thing.The history of CFS has its roots clearly in the last
century. The issues surrounding it are shared with a
number of other poorly understood or 'medically
unexplained' illnesses.
Despite the age and size of this problem it seems that
we have made little progress in achieving an
understanding that permits effective treatment to be
offered to and accepted by those affected.
Those who cannot be fit into a scheme of objective
bodily illness yet refuse to be placed into and accept
the stigma of mental illness remain to paraphrase
Bernard Shaw the undeserving sick of our society and
our health-service.
However things are changing. Neuroscience is breaking
down the barrier between mind and brain. Doctor patient
relationships are changing to give more credence to the
patient's subjective experience. The collaborative
integrative approach of good CBT provides one model of
how we could proceed.
Perhaps we will do better in the next century. I hope
so.
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/ME_-_What_do_we_Know_-_October_1999_-_310805.pdf
p.s. The title of the lecture 'ME - What do we Know?' was pretty amusing. Not much, in his case.
Just got back from my doctors appt and saw that she answered my question - yay!
http://www.reddit.com/r/science/com...ma_series_im_professor_mady_hornig_at/cp685i2
Was a little disappointed she didn't answer the most important part (#3)... wonder why? Ideas?
In retrospect, I suppose we should have mentioned Phoenix Rising.
I didn't think ahead to people who'd recognise their undiagnosed condition and want info.
Send 'em all here, @Soundthealarm21!
So I logged on at 6pm UK, up voted, posted once or twice then had to leave before things got going.
So it got on the front page?
It was on the front of /r/all for about 30 minutes. It got quite a good response: 2,216 net karma. So a lot of people saw it.