Dr. Yes said:I really don't want any "help" from McClure, for three basic reasons:
(1) she is obviously capable of blinding arrogance,
(2) she is obviously capable of being very unprofessional (see her press comments, especially to the BBC),
(3) she is obviously capable of crappy science.
Very good points indeed - although it is insufficient for us to let it lie now - i think many of us were holding back in the hope that some co-operation may have been prevailing in the background, however we now have clear proof that isnt going to happen.
How can one person and a weasal take it upon themselves to act on behalf of the regulatory authorites in this country and even then produce such an unprofessional and rushed piece of work? That isnt ethical practice and surely those initial decisions are way outside of her and the Weasal's durisdiction anyway. They arent tasked with monitoring how doctors are prescribing treatments - that is under the remit of the GMC.
I wonder if there is a regulatory type body that McClure practices under...if someone were considering lodging an official complaint against her? *whistles*