I know this isn't the case but it has a similar feeling to me.
No, I think she is just very naive and has taken bad advice (if any) on how to market herself.
I know this isn't the case but it has a similar feeling to me.
No, I think she is just very naive and has taken bad advice (if any) on how to market herself.
This might help answer some questions.
I found the following image, from her book, posted on her Twitter page...
https://twitter.com/MECFSRecovered/status/502526708202106880/photo/1
The citations are mostly about Mercury and Thimerosal. Rich Van Konynenburg is also mentioned in one of the citations as is a study on the effects of supplementing with Magnesium for Chronic Fatigue.
Nothing really new here, unless she's discovered an innovative treatment regimen to help deal with Mercury toxicity. Bear in mind that this may just a small portion of what the book is really about.
What in earth does that even mean?
Nor does a lack of ISBN preclude loaning the book between individuals. There's no law that prevents people from loaning any book to another person, ISBN or not. Zoe does a lot of outright lying. It appears that she says whatever suits her purpose without any regard for the truth.An absence of an ISBN does not preclude being loaned as a library book. Likewise, it is legal to summarise and quote the book as part of a book review, despite what is said on the T&C on the website.
(*zooming in* *zooming in even more*)
We've seen this sort of thing before, and it's always been worthless rubbish
This brings to mind the saying, "Fool me once........"I think this thread would be a good guide to those writing 'recovery' books in terms of what not to do
(If I was cured, I'd be working in medical science to do trials and uncover the details of how it works, personally...)
Craig Robinson said:detoxification sweating regimes
"This book has no assigned ISBN, is not available in public libraries and due to copyright reasons cannot be loaned out to anyone."
In the US I don't think you can restrict distribution of a book like that.
I meant that the laws regarding copyright wouldn't allow the copyright owner to restrict distribution in that way. Once you sell a book, you no longer have control over it, and the fair use doctrine allows for publication of reviews and short excerpts. Whether it has an ISBN has nothing to do with anything.In theory she could sell me a license to possess and read her book while she retains title to it. This is standard practice for computer software and books, but nobody seems to notice or care. As you suggest, someone trying to sell a physical book on those terms would be laughed at.
"Posted copy of my book with relevant parts highlighted to World Health Organisation today, at their request #mecfs."
I suspect you are correct.I doubt WHO asks people to send them their books. Probably another self-serving lie.
Ah, but that must be the secret to recovery! Making money by fleecing desperate ME patients is the cureI don't understand how someone who said she was ill for 15yrs would have such little compassion and a disingenuous approach to selling her book to people who are suffering and became poor as a result of losing their health.
As someone who had to sit through an Intellectual Property class in law school, I'm quite sure it can't be restricted in that matter in the US. It potentially can be regarding ebooks, due to the DMCA, but I think the rest of the world generally laughs at that absurd bit of legislation."This book has no assigned ISBN, is not available in public libraries and due to copyright reasons cannot be loaned out to anyone."
In the US I don't think you can restrict distribution of a book like that.