I remain open-but-sceptical o the idea of XMRV being "a human pathogen", and possibly the cause of CFS.
Do the authors of the study quoted above have any REASONING to back up the last two sentences?
I.E. - "We propose that the patient-derived sites are the result of PCR contamination. This observation further undermines the notion that XMRV is a genuine human pathogen."
Do the authors of the study quoted above have any REASONING to back up the last two sentences?
I.E. - "We propose that the patient-derived sites are the result of PCR contamination. This observation further undermines the notion that XMRV is a genuine human pathogen."