What will a biomarker really give us?

[Jackb23]

New study from Australian team on biomarkers

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-023-02893-9

Edit: looks like they also have tried to put their TRPM3 findings into context in a new theory, it involves the endoplasmic reticulum which is also the center of a NIH researchers theory coming out of the intramural study.

When is the NIH going to publish?

 

[Consul]

When is the NIH going to publish?

No idea

 

[Osaca]

Didn't they submit to a journal and are waiting for the review (the other papers will then be submitted after the inital publication), at least that is what I gathered)? Going by his previous work it could be something like the New England Journal of Medicine (which takes roughly 5 months from submission to publication).

Anyways, we can hopefully expect some small news from Nath from his talk next week.

 

[Consul]

That is correct.

Will they release videos and stuff from that conference? Ron Davis is going as well, will be nice to get an update.

 

[Osaca]

That is correct.

Will they release videos and stuff from that conference? Ron Davis is going as well, will be nice to get an update.

Yes. Videos will be uploaded to the homepage, similarly as for the past conferences.

 

[Tsukareta]

A biomarker would be tremendously helpful for me personally, as I experience moderate level of ignorance from my family and medical doctors towards CFS, which can be an issue at time when my functioning is lower, and also in the past I had to try to prove to judges in court that I had CFS, which might be a problem again in future, particularly as I now have what I think it is a separate but overlapping illness that again doctors can't identify or treat ( I suspect its caused by mold toxins but I don't fully understand how that can be possible ).