Sidereal, yes, the diagnostic problems cut both ways, and the result is problems for patients on both side of the aisle. There sometimes may be unscrupulous mercenaries that promote themselves as ILADS, or other alternative solution providers, and take advantage of people, some of whom may never have had Lyme. Agreed. I would suggest, however, that these are the exception to the rule.
The thing is, if the system weren't broken by a small group of individuals to begin with, and maintained more or less by that same group, those few scavengers wouldn't have a market to practice in. So Lyme advocates are forced to police both sides of the aisle, all the while trying to redefine the entire approach - from diagnostics thru treatment - to a hugely disputed and under-reported disease. And all the while potentially straddling several (sometimes dodgy) diagnoses, including ME of course, but also other TBDs like babesia and bartonella.
I apologize for the off-topic sidebar.