DT's from bedbound sick people? i doubt this somehow. is this proven or did he just claim it?
Bedbound people are no less capable of making email death threats. Especially those with nothing to lose, and with mental health issues that may cloud their judgement, it's all too easy to fire off death threats.
What I think scared Wessely is that he knows many ME/CFS patients have unstable mental health, so maybe he imagines they are more capable of carrying out such threats. Not all ME/CFS patients are bedbound; the mild patients are able to work, and quite able to go out and about.
Some have argued that Wessely provided no evidence for the death threats, but I have no reason to doubt his claims. He had to seek advice from the police, and had to have a panic alarm fitted in his university desk, according to newspaper reports.
The police advised him to draw up lists of patients on ME/CFS forums and in real life who might present a militant threat to him, based on their comments. I was probably on his list, as I was very vociferously against his views that ME/CFS is a condition maintained by the patients own belief system.
It was not just Wessely who was hit with death threats: back in those agitated days, a British virologist who published a viral study whose results some in the ME/CFS patient community did not like received a barage of hate mail from ME/CFS patients.
She said that one person emailed her daily for a whole month, saying that he wanted her to die. She was completely innocent, had never claimed ME/CFS was psychological, but got caught up in the crossfire because Wessely was one of the authors list on her study.
There have been great successes. Most of the new ME/CFS patients are not even aware of the activist history, because it's no longer talked about on the ME/CFS forums.
A huge success was when the
PACE trial study was finally exposed as a fraud, even though ME/CFS patients had to go to court to get the raw data from the study made available for scrutiny. A huge amount of effort went into fighting PACE, it was a running battle that lasted at least 5 years or more.
The university who conducted the PACE study spent £250,000 on legal fees trying to prevent the raw data from the study being released. But in a landmark legal case, the ME/CFS community activists won the right to get the raw data from the university.
Once the raw data from PACE was examined by independent experts, the PACE study results (that purported to show CBT could cure ME/CFS) were demonstrated to be just bullshit. So PACE was blown out of the water, and this was an enormous battle won by the ME/CFS activists.
In the US, the famous
Institute of Medicine report clearly stated that ME/CFS is not psychological. This was much anticipated report was groundbreaking, and also led to a new set of diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS, the IOM criteria
In the UK, the NHS's
NICE guidelines have been changed to clearly state that ME/CFS is a physical illness. And remove graded exercise as a ME/CFS treatment. NICE are the organisation that provide the rules and guidelines that all UK doctors must follow.
All this was the result of intense patient activism and long term efforts. Some of the famous activists are listed
here.
Continental Europe has never been very advanced in the area of the examining the biological basis of mental health, or complex diseases like ME/CFS.
I think this is because Continental Europe has always been strong on social engineering and social conformity, whereas the UK has a different philosophy of individualism. So in Continental Europe, because of this engineering, there is a tendency to try to treat mental health at the psychological and sociological level. Autism is still considered in Freudian terms in France.
thou i see a general problem with western medicine, i think its deeply corrupt, broken and partially useless or even harmfull. i dont think this is to be solved on a disease by disease activism base. the whole system must change.
This is standard cliche that gets passed from one person to another online, without any explanation or rational basis. If you think the system is broken, explain why, and point to a better way of doing things. Propagating these sort of anti-pharma or anti-science sentiments without providing any better answers gets us nowhere really.