Forbin
Senior Member
- Messages
- 966
Though it's always impressive to see a cutting edge citation from 111 years ago...
...even Edward Shorter thought that the 19th century diagnosis of neurasthenia was so haphazard that, in his words,
Of course, the article is about fibromyalgia, but I can't imagine that it makes anymore sense to compare current cases of that with cases of an ill-defined entity not from this century, not from the last century, but from the century before that.
The neurasthenia shut down followed loss of societal support with the recognition that neurasthenia was not a condition of over-sensitive reflexes and was better considered within a psychological framework [14,15].
14 Beard GM (1905) A Practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (Neurasthenia), Its Symptoms, Nature, Sequences, Treatment (5th edn.) New York: E.B. Treat & Company.
...even Edward Shorter thought that the 19th century diagnosis of neurasthenia was so haphazard that, in his words,
"...great caution is indicated before assuming an even rough equivalence between neurasthenia and chronic fatigue. Neurasthenia seems mainly to have served as a wastebasket diagnosis, standing for a heterogeneous mix of neuro- and psychopathology." https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0470514396
Of course, the article is about fibromyalgia, but I can't imagine that it makes anymore sense to compare current cases of that with cases of an ill-defined entity not from this century, not from the last century, but from the century before that.