I honestly could not find an appropriate section on the forums in which to post this article. I seriously questioned whether or not it has any place on these forums. I have posted it because of the potential damage it will do and the need to challenge the article's premise and draw attention to the real harm it will do.
Kempke, S., et al., Unraveling the role of perfectionism in chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a distinction between adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism?, Psychiatry Res. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.016
The authors do an absolutely flawless job of capturing the danger of the diagnostic/cohort issues perpetuated by the CDC as they confound depression with CFS. They then gleefully run headlong down the CBT/GET road with recommendations on how one may refine CBT (apparently we need to lower our standards and expectations - I'd suggest we start by lowering our expectations of the psychiatric community even further - as if that was possible).
Someone needs to respond to this. It is published in the journal Psychiatry Research. People's lives will be impacted.
Jennie, I know this question is likely to ignite another CAA flare up but I have to ask, what is the CAA's policy on responding to articles like this? If the CAA has no policy, does the IACFS/ME have a policy?
I tried to respond to the CDC's article on CFS and personality this past summer and simply I couldn't sustain the effort/went into a prolonged crash. I have a pdf copy of this entire article if anyone who is interested.
Kempke, S., et al., Unraveling the role of perfectionism in chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a distinction between adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism?, Psychiatry Res. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.016
The authors claim to be studying and writing about CFS and if the article were not so horrifying in its potential to do serious harm, I would have thought it to be a satirical piece put together by some of the more clever amongst us. I doubt that collectively we could have come up with a more perfect piece of satire.In the current study, we investigated whether the distinction between adaptive (i.e. high personal standards) and maladaptive (i.e. concern over mistakes and doubt about actions) perfectionism that has been found in the literature, is also valid in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We hypothesized that maladaptive, but not adaptive, perfectionism would be significantly and positively related to severity of fatigue and depression in CFS. We examined this hypothesis in a sample of 192 CFS patients using structural equation modelling (SEM). Although the two perfectionism dimensions were related to each other, results supported a model in which only maladaptive perfectionism was positively related to severity of fatigue and depression. Further, we found that depression fully mediated the effect of maladaptive perfectionism on fatigue. The results suggest that adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism are two distinct, albeit related, dimensions in CFS. Findings of this study have important implications for theory and treatment of CFS, particularly for cognitivebehavioral treatment.
The authors do an absolutely flawless job of capturing the danger of the diagnostic/cohort issues perpetuated by the CDC as they confound depression with CFS. They then gleefully run headlong down the CBT/GET road with recommendations on how one may refine CBT (apparently we need to lower our standards and expectations - I'd suggest we start by lowering our expectations of the psychiatric community even further - as if that was possible).
Please understand if I don't participate much in the discussion of this article. After having slogged my way through it, I'm feeling like I need to go take a shower.Results of this study may have important implications for treatment of CFS and particularly cognitivebehavioral treatments which are considered, together with Graded Exercise Therapy, to be the only evidence based treatments for CFS.
Someone needs to respond to this. It is published in the journal Psychiatry Research. People's lives will be impacted.
Jennie, I know this question is likely to ignite another CAA flare up but I have to ask, what is the CAA's policy on responding to articles like this? If the CAA has no policy, does the IACFS/ME have a policy?
I tried to respond to the CDC's article on CFS and personality this past summer and simply I couldn't sustain the effort/went into a prolonged crash. I have a pdf copy of this entire article if anyone who is interested.