A thought about including BPS
idiots researchers in the conference (and collaborative) ~~ How embarrassing is it going to become to stand up at a conference chock full of information about biological evidence in ME/CFS from high-powered international researchers and keep talking about your pokey little low-quality research claiming false illness beliefs and somaticism? Seriously, they look like.. well, idiots. They have to see that eventually. Maybe. Or at least everyone else, including the media will. Compare and contrast has it's benefits when evaluating different approaches. Even politicians and the media are not completely blind to that.
Perhaps the collaborative organizers are simply letting the BPS school shoot itself down. "Who wants to go to the MRC conference this year and look like an idiot? You? You?" {crickets}
Happy to ask questions as long as they r not negative towards specific research regardless of what our views might be
This strikes me as odd. "We must not ask questions about Nazism and white supremacy because all viewpoints are equally valid. We don't want to be negative, now do we?"
There is a limit to acceptance of differing viewpoints.
In some ways this reminds me of the Afghan government trying to include the Taliban in their political process in order to get past the violence and move forward. The hope was that by allowing them some say, they would begin to cooperate with everyone else. In case anybody didn't notice, it's not working. Some groups cannot be negotiated with. Their position is mutually exclusive to other positions. They cannot exist together.
The conference sounds like it's going great!
Three cheers for the organizers and participants!