lancelot
Senior Member
- Messages
- 324
- Location
- southern california
I think I already explained my feelings pretty well on the subject...
How is CBT and GET working out for your mental illness?
I think I already explained my feelings pretty well on the subject...
How is CBT and GET working out for your mental illness?
How many decades has HIV research gone on without substantive results?
One of the most frustrating things about this forum, is the constant insistence, by the vast majority of forum members, that XMRV is the cause of CFS/ME. There is no proof whatsoever of this is the case. Even Dan Peterson himself, has gone on record, numerous times, saying that the retrovirus could very well just be a passenger to another condition that takes advantage of a depressed immune system.
That being the case, this chart of yours seems to a very premature and speculative assumption of the situation... to say the least. In which case I really question it's value.
Perhaps people's desperation to finally be vindicated, that they are really sick and it isn't all in their head, has caused them to ignore some cold hard facts, including numerous comments from research member Dan Peterson that XMRV may indeed just be a "passenger" to a broader condition.
Not sure why the prospect of having a virus excites you so much. How many viruses, in the entire history of medicine, have we found cures for?
I'm of the opinion that researchers like Martin Pall, Kenny De Meirleir, Rich Van Konynenburg and even Freddd are far closer to uncracking this thing that WPI is.
One of the most frustrating things about this forum, is the constant insistence, by the vast majority of forum members, that XMRV is the cause of CFS/ME. There is no proof whatsoever of this is the case. Even Dan Peterson himself, has gone on record, numerous times, saying that the retrovirus could very well just be a passenger to another condition that takes advantage of a depressed immune system.
That being the case, this chart of yours seems to a very premature and speculative assumption of the situation... to say the least. In which case I really question it's value.
One of the most frustrating things about this forum, is the constant insistence, by the vast majority of forum members, that XMRV is the cause of CFS/ME. There is no proof whatsoever of this is the case. Even Dan Peterson himself, has gone on record, numerous times, saying that the retrovirus could very well just be a passenger to another condition that takes advantage of a depressed immune system.
That being the case, this chart of yours seems to a very premature and speculative assumption of the situation... to say the least. In which case I really question it's value.
-------->>>> The very real problem is that no one knows just what this newly discovered Retrovirus family causes. I suspect it plays a role in ME/CFS. I also suspect it plays a role in other diseases and cancers as well. But we do NOT know what it does since there is very little funding for research on this virus. I am stunned and amazied that no one outside the CFS community is aware of this newly discovered human infectious retrovirus. I do believe it is infectious - and of course, I do believe it "exists". Someone want to give me a reason why my husband is very sick with CFS after living with a sick wife for 10 years? We both got the same kick-off virus (for me) at the same time but he recovered. Ten years of me being sick and he gets another mild virus and down he went and has stayed for the last six years. He's a poster child for CFS. He's also a male that got sick at age 60 with all the symptoms of CFS except for pain (lucky).
We need funding for research and fast moving clinical trials. IF those anit-viral meds help or cure those of us with ME/CFS then you have your answer - just NOT in the way YOU want it. That's medicine for you. They have meds that work but they can not expain WHY they work - read the inserts in the meds and see the statements that they don't understand the mechanisms of action.
How many decades has HIV research gone on without substantive results?