BurnA
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,087
This is from Nov 11 but I can't find a thread on it, if there is one already just let me know.
There is a comment from SW worth reading.
This is what David Tuller had to say about it:
The PACE Study: Open Access and Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Keith Geraghty, of the University of Manchester, has published this excellent article on the flaws in the PACE study of ME/CFS. He makes important points about academic integrity that are relevant to all of us (including those who are unaffected by the PACE problem itself; for background, see here and here). Here are two of his more important observations.
First, regarding data transparency, he notes that it took five years for patients to obtain the raw data underlying the PACE study, which ultimately revealed that the results (for the effectiveness of CBT and GET) had been exaggerated by about threefold:
There is a comment from SW worth reading.
This is what David Tuller had to say about it: