i'm beginning to really apprecaite Kim's "shock 'em" theory.
"I prefer the sensationalist, yet scientifically accurate approach. I drop words like: cancer, blood supply, transfusions, asymptomatic carriers, and sexual transmission into my little spiel. When they get that LOOK on their faces, I know they won't forget about it. "
i love it, i admit i am starting to take sick pleasure in throwing out that sort of thing when people ask me if i've just tried the latest fad herb or device out there - which is daily. it's kind of fun to go "in the same family as AIDS" & watch them shut up - fast! haha!
yes folks, real very real disease - & yeh, when they find out it could actually mean something to them, suddenly they kinda take notice dont they? dont' want to sound so jerky but i've been ignored for a long time, i deserve to get a little pleasure out of - how did i hear it said here in another thread? - making them "choke on their toast". haha!
but i do have a tough one i could use help on, i have seen some of the posts here about acupuncture & it's dangers. i have a friend who is really on me to go to her guy & i dont' know how to get her to understand that i just dont' believe in it.
she just thinks herbs are where drugs come from anyway - & i don't know how to say "look, you dont' give a cancer patient a salad & tell them they'll be fine."
dont' get me wrong, i'm willing to try acupuncture - again. i'm willing to take herbs. i try to eat well, as best i can - whatever. but how do you get them to understand that is not a treatment for a retrovirus. you dont' give that stuff to AIDS patients & send them on their way.
docs do SOMETHING to the drugs to make them bigger badder faster.
anyway, i'm not scientist-y like some here so wondering if i can get some help.
thanks
