• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

SSI asset amount limit is still set to 1989 levels. Asking the US Congress (and Senate) to change that.

Judee

Psalm 46:1-3
Messages
4,537
Location
Great Lakes
So some of you know I was turned down for SSDI about 7 years ago. I can't apply again because now my credits have expired. I could possibly apply to SSI however the approval process can take months. In the meantime they won't allow applicants to have more than $2000 in savings.

For someone who is not able to work at all, that means only a month or at most two to live on while waiting to be approved. :(

The $2,000 resource limit for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients has not been updated since 1989, failing to keep up with inflation. This outdated limit forces SSI recipients to essentially live in poverty and spend down any modest savings they may have, rather than allowing them to maintain a small financial cushion for emergencies or future needs. https://www.investopedia.com/ssi-resource-limit-inflation-7559696

There was a bipartisan effort to update the resource limit called the SSI Saving Penalty Elimination Act
(VIDEO) by raising it to $10,000 for individuals and indexing it to inflation going forward, which would provide SSI recipients with some ability to save while still qualifying for vital income assistance.

However, I don't think that passed and until such reforms are enacted, the severely outdated $2,000 cap remains a significant financial hardship for those relying on or even applying for SSI benefits.

So if you're in the US, I'm asking you if you would consider emailing your congressional representative and asking them to work to change this rule. https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

Thank you.

Edit: Researching this more, I believe it was held up in a Senate Finance Committee, so maybe it would also be good to contact our Senators. It's an election year so maybe they would actually act on it if enough people contact them.
 
Last edited:

Judee

Psalm 46:1-3
Messages
4,537
Location
Great Lakes
Last edited:

Zebra

Senior Member
Messages
893
Location
Northern California
The $2,000 resource limit for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients has not been updated since 1989, failing to keep up with inflation. This outdated limit forces SSI recipients to essentially live in poverty and spend down any modest savings they may have, rather than allowing them to maintain a small financial cushion for emergencies or future needs.

This is an important topic for all US citizens, but especially those of us in need of government assistance.

NPR recently did an in-depth piece on the SSI rules and regulations you cited above.

I'm sharing a link to the piece which is an 8 minute audio recording (or a very long read of the transcript).

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/08/g-s1-3475/social-security-ssi-asset-limits
 
Messages
79
$2000 is ridiculous, that wasn't enough to live on for more than a couple months or so even back in 1989. The government hands out billions of incentives to buy electric cars and billions go overseas for bad purposes, etc etc but sick people have to jump through a hoop to get basic assistance. If you are too sick to do the jumping required, too bad for you.

There are tricks to get around that, simply have a family member or trusted friend keep it for you. Some people keep savings in gold or silver, some keep cash. Whatever you keep in a safe deposit box is out of sight and doesn't exist as far as the govt is concerned. When they need money they take some out or sell some gold. But, if someone had $20k in the bank and it suddenly went down to $2k they are going to ask questions. Better to take it out little by little over a period of time.

If you were denied in the past, changes could be coming up in '25 with a change in policies
 
Back