Pyrrhus
Senior Member
- Messages
- 4,172
- Location
- U.S., Earth
You have mentioned that Arbidol is only effective for fighting an acute Coxsackie infection. Later on, your referred to a source that leaves it open whether or not Arbidol only works for an acute infection (the authors do not know precisely).
That's correct. Previously, it seemed that Arbidol/Umifenovir worked by blocking viral entry into the cells. Now it's not clear exactly how it works, so it is hard to predict when it might work and when it might not.
the muscle tissue can be re-infected with virus from the motor neurons that are activated when the muscle is contracted. In this case the virus persists in the ganglia of the spinal cord and may travel from the spinal cord through the motor neuron to the muscle, a process that can take a day or so."
Following that mechanism, I think that Arbidol could be beneficial for fighting a chronic Coxsackievirus infection since a further spread of the virus would be blocked by the effect of Arbidol.
Since we don't know exactly how Arbidol/Umifenovir works, we unfortunately can't be sure that it would block viral spread.
Easily put, when a virus can't spread anymore, it stops existing in the course of time as every human cell dies with time.
I wish it were that simple. Not every human cell dies with time. Some cells last for years and some cells last for a lifetime. Brain cells, especially, can last for a lifetime.
I have taken Arbidol for some days now and am curious about how I will feel in the future. I will post my health status.
Thank you for sharing your experience with Arbidol! We may learn more from patient experiences with Arbidol than we might learn from the confusing literature.
Hope this helps.