pictureofhealth
XMRV - L'Agent du Jour
- Messages
- 534
- Location
- Europe
Ads 3 & 6 stand out to me. They are visually arresting at first glance, so immediately the reader will look at them, but not too overwhelming with detail when they start to read it.
I realise you are appealing intially to reporters, but agreed with Xandoff and Marco - somehow you have to link this illness to the public/ general concern ie to answer the - 'Why should we Care?' question very clearly.
That's why I like 6 because it includes the: 'According to the CDC ...' para which links the illness with the general public (which includes reporters), it adds the word 'mysterious' which arouses curiosity, and it links ME/CFS with other disabling illnesses that the public do understand already (heart disease etc).
1. V Good design & really like the idea that XMRV 'raises questions', but poss too much info at first glance & not enough general reader appeal IMO?
2. Recumbent man + illness immediately to me = AIDS.
*3. LIKE most, but need link to public (eg Marco's suggestion 'Have YOU got the X-Factor?' or something like).
4. Same as 3 but no image to draw readers' attention, so prefer 3.
5. Great pic of Rivka (obviously! , but way too much info for anyone other than us to be interested IMO.
*6. LIKE, lots of info but done in a way that links the illness to the general population & other illnesses they do understand & draws them in with 'mystery illness'. Also raises questions, doesn't just state that 'in blood supply' - leaves reader open to more possibilities.
I think that we still have to be quite careful exactly how we link XMRV with ME/CFS and the Blood Supply even though many countries have taken precautionary steps - its not technically 'proven' yet, although strongly suspected (& for that reason alone media may not print if seen as too much scaremongering without scientific evidence - all they need to do is make x1 phone call to FDA/NIH to find out).
If the blood scare remains unproven or XMRV doesn't 'pan out' for ME/CFS, we may end up with 'egg on our faces'. Perhaps its best to simply raise possibilities at this stage - which is why I like Ad 6.
Wow, thank you so much to everyone who has worked so hard to design these. Sorry much longer reply than I ever intended, but got really into it!!!
Good luck (even though I am in UK) !
I realise you are appealing intially to reporters, but agreed with Xandoff and Marco - somehow you have to link this illness to the public/ general concern ie to answer the - 'Why should we Care?' question very clearly.
That's why I like 6 because it includes the: 'According to the CDC ...' para which links the illness with the general public (which includes reporters), it adds the word 'mysterious' which arouses curiosity, and it links ME/CFS with other disabling illnesses that the public do understand already (heart disease etc).
1. V Good design & really like the idea that XMRV 'raises questions', but poss too much info at first glance & not enough general reader appeal IMO?
2. Recumbent man + illness immediately to me = AIDS.
*3. LIKE most, but need link to public (eg Marco's suggestion 'Have YOU got the X-Factor?' or something like).
4. Same as 3 but no image to draw readers' attention, so prefer 3.
5. Great pic of Rivka (obviously! , but way too much info for anyone other than us to be interested IMO.
*6. LIKE, lots of info but done in a way that links the illness to the general population & other illnesses they do understand & draws them in with 'mystery illness'. Also raises questions, doesn't just state that 'in blood supply' - leaves reader open to more possibilities.
I think that we still have to be quite careful exactly how we link XMRV with ME/CFS and the Blood Supply even though many countries have taken precautionary steps - its not technically 'proven' yet, although strongly suspected (& for that reason alone media may not print if seen as too much scaremongering without scientific evidence - all they need to do is make x1 phone call to FDA/NIH to find out).
If the blood scare remains unproven or XMRV doesn't 'pan out' for ME/CFS, we may end up with 'egg on our faces'. Perhaps its best to simply raise possibilities at this stage - which is why I like Ad 6.
Wow, thank you so much to everyone who has worked so hard to design these. Sorry much longer reply than I ever intended, but got really into it!!!
Good luck (even though I am in UK) !