Yeah! I am pretty new in the Bay Area with Medicare coverage and am hoping for some guidance from someone about a good doc. Hit or miss has always been fruitless for me and a drain on time, energy and hope.
Had an excellent primary doctor in Vermont. Found him after years via recommendations. He is no more educated about this illness than others—though is more experienced now—yet smart, kind, responsible and willing to learn—as long as he sees any treatment as sufficiently safe for a patient and justifiable, according to his medical knowledge. He was a pleasure after years of « roaming in the wilderness », including with specialists who should have known more than they did, I thought, when my problems fell across their specialty (neurologists, immunologists, endocrinologists, etc.) But these doctors still only seemed to see those issues in the standard ways within those specialties and not consider and think with the whole symptom picture. To me they didn’t apply the specialized knowledge they had to my overall picture. Mistakes can be made that way, and you hope they won’t be major! Caution is always advisable in these circumstances, I learned, despite my sometimes feeling very willing to take a risk for some improvement.
All the years of having to be « expert » in our own field and condition. It is not fully possible, of course, but what I mean is that there is a need to retain a leadership position and be assertive. If collaboration will work with the doctor, then that seems best to me. And definitely not just simply applying the standard answers to their standard categorizations. There is a regimented, corporate form that the medical field takes which is detrimental to patients, especially those who fall outside the boxes and whose condition has not yet been mapped and formulated for a quick, uniform response.