It is very disturbing to me that cancer drugs are bringing relief to the symptoms of CFS/ME.
Don't mistake these "modern" cancer drugs for "ye olde" chemotherapy. Rituximab targets very specifically one type of immune cells (so called B-cells) and kill only them off. In lymphomas these cells multiply too much, so lymphomas are a specific type of cancer. In autoimmune diseases these B-cells happen to produce something that is bad for the body. Two different diseases, which only seem to share B-cells involvment so Rituximab might help in both.
That said: Rituximab is no candy and shouldn't be taken lightly. It kills off one type of immune cells and can have side-effects. Patients discretion is advised.
What I don't understand is that what we have seems to be a cross between cancer and autoimmune.
I am absolutely terrified at where the research and study is taking us.
We seem to have an illness that cannot be cured but treated best by taking an antiviral (Valcyte) and a cancer drug (Rituximab) simultaneously.
Does anybody know if we can be put on Rituximab in the US based on the Norwegian study ? Would any doctor do that ?
The easiest way would be to get help from a rheumatologist or immunologist. Rituximab is a on label treatment for RA, so if you have unexplained joint pain (as many ME patients have), and show the Mella/Fluge study to the doc, chances are could get RTX as a treatment attempting to target both. If you could get it prescribed on the condition of rheuma symptoms, there's also a slight chance a HMO would cover it.
But the very idea of larger trials of promising treatments for ME/CFS are the stuff of a madman's dreams! If the research world is going to continue to fail to research ME/CFS seriously, then small scale trials, unpublished data, experimental science and anecdotal evidence are all we have to go on. If the alternative is to sit and wait for decades to come while the research world continues to ignore us, then it's simply inevitable that sufferers who are desperate for treatment will continue to try anything that shows promise, however thin the scientific evidence may be. Since there's hardly any good evidence about anything, and hardly anybody is researching using appropriate criteria, we have to base our decisions on what little evidence there is. Of course it's not an ideal situation, but that's hardly our fault.Where do you take this from? I am not aware of any studies showing the effectiveness of Valcyte plus Rituximab, and Valcyte alone surely helps only a few people, if at all. And the tests for Rituximab are at the beginning! We don't know if it helps at larger trials.
I have heaps of patients on MTX for rheumatic reasons - it isnt that bad. Just needs monitoring and folate. Esp compared to the severe disability and CNS dysfunction with CFS. If you are "lucky" enough to have psoriasis at least there is a more valid reason to trial MTX. I am sure you will not be disappointed. Whether it will be as impressive as corticosteroids however is debatable. And it isnt addictive.I have had cfs for 30 years. I was recently diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), an autoimmune disease. The rheum prescribed methotrexate. I'm afraid to take it. haven't started. However, I wonder if it will have a positive affect on the cfs. I'm very curious, but not sure I'm curious enough to take this chemo drug (at a lower dose for PsA. My minimal understanding is that methotrexate eliminates subsets of inflammatory white blood cells.. Those cells are adding to joint destruction. Does cfs involve inflammatory white blood cells, and the same subset as with PsA? I have no idea.
I have heaps of patients on MTX for rheumatic reasons - it isnt that bad. Just needs monitoring and folate. Esp compared to the severe disability and CNS dysfunction with CFS. If you are "lucky" enough to have psoriasis at least there is a more valid reason to trial MTX. I am sure you will not be disappointed. Whether it will be as impressive as corticosteroids however is debatable. And it isnt addictive.