- Messages
- 17
- Location
- Mentor, Ohio
Osler's Web (pp.214-215) references an Aussie paper, Mukherjee, et.al., Abnormal Red Blood-Cell Morphology in ME, Lancet, Aug 8 1987. The paper noted the RBCs had a "globular" or "sickled" appearance that fluctuated according to symptoms.
In a 1988 conference, Komaroff and Buchwald confirmed ESR to be rock-bottom low, i.e., 0 to 2, in about 40% of "CFS" patients, something Buchwald said was only seen in sickle cell diseases. Byron Hyde further confirmed this is only otherwise found in sickle-cell anemia, inherited sperocytosis, hyper-gammoglobulinemia and hyper-fibrogenemia. (Wikipedia, FWIW, suggests likewise.)
My initial Dx of CFS/CFIDS was made by someone familiar with Cheney's work, partly on the basis of low ESR. In nearly twelve years, I've only once seen it above 3.
By the 40% measure, ESR would not be a lone biomarker, yet I still wonder why (unless I missed something) low ESR is not mentioned in the Canadian Consensus definition. That's also led me to ask whether Byron Hyde was not picked for the author board by Health Canada or chose not to participate.
Thanks Warbler for finding this.... interesting...