Hi, Im sorry it has taken me so long to get back to everyone, I have been recovering!
There are some posts of mine which relate to the research on another thread - see #15.
We got there very early, so we sat in the third row. I was just behind Annette Whittemore and Judy Mikovits, so I could see their responses. At one point, I heard JM say to Malcolm Hooper "I have no doubt" and I think he must have asked her about her research. She was VERY definite and looked completely confident. I spoke to AW. She is a lovely, friendly, warm woman. The atmosphere in the conference was happy and exhilarating, all the researchers were glad to be there, some were very excited. It was wonderful to be with people who loved their work and were excited by the research they were doing and the opportunity to meet other teams. I sat just behind the researchers who were all on the first row, so I could see thir reactions.
I did not recognise Dr. Peterson at the conference, which I regret. From where I sat I could not see much of the audience who were all behind me at a neck-straining angle! The researchers were all respectful of each others work. JM never gave the impression she had any problems with the scientific response to her work, she treated it as what happens when you are in the process of getting new findings accepted and was respectful of her scientific colleagues. I think she realises it will take time and is a sensible, resiliant woman.
I think we patients probably worry much more about these things because we have little informastion, so gossip goes round, and we are much more vulnerable and of course, ill.
Judy Mikovits was very boyant and energetic and thoroughly HAPPY.
As I said in my other post, my impression of JM is that she is an exceptionally clever scientist who understands her field in depth. She is not what her opponents try to make her out to be. I do not think she would make a mistake, particularly an elementary mistake to do with contamination, which she is accused of doing. This is all to buy time, because what she has found is so disturbing. We should support the WPI. Dont worry about negative papers, it is so much easier not to find this virus than to find it. You have to be good to isolate this virus, and JM is good. She knows what she is doing. If she were as incompetent as some try to suggest, do you seriously think the US government would spend the money it has trying to investigate her findings and clean up the blood supply?
I did recognise Peter Spencer from AfME and Charles Shepherd from MEA in the audience.
This was a very special event, for lots of reasons. I advise you to buy the IiME DVD of the conference.
http://www.Investinme.org/infocentre Education Homepage.htm