Replicated blood-based biomarkers for ME/CFS not explained by inactivity [preprint], 2024, Beentjes et al

kushami

Senior Member
Messages
406
https://meassociation.org.uk/2024/0...rkers-for-me-cfs-not-explained-by-inactivity/

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME; sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome) is a relatively common and female-biased disease of unknown pathogenesis that profoundly decreases patients’ health-related quality-of-life.

ME diagnosis is hindered by the absence of robustly defined and specific biomarkers that are easily measured from available sources such as blood, and unaffected by ME patients’ low level of physical activity.

Previous studies of blood biomarkers have not yielded replicated results, perhaps due to low study sample sizes (n < 100). Here, we use UK Biobank (UKB) data for up to 1,455 ME cases and 131,303 population controls to discover hundreds of molecular and cellular blood traits that differ significantly between cases and controls.

Importantly, 116 of these traits are replicated, as they are significant for both female and male cohorts. Our analysis used semi-parametric efficient estimators, an initial Super Learner fit followed by a one-step correction, three types of mediators, and natural direct and indirect estimands, to decompose the average effect of ME status on molecular and cellular traits.

Strikingly, these trait differences cannot be explained by ME cases’ restricted activity. Of 3,237 traits considered, ME status had a significant effect on only one, via the “Duration of walk” (UKB field 874) mediator. By contrast, ME status had a significant direct effect on 290 traits (9%). As expected, these effects became more significant with increased stringency of case and control definition.

Significant female and male traits were indicative of chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and liver disease. Individually, significant effects on blood traits, however, were not sufficient to cleanly distinguish cases from controls. Nevertheless, their large number, lack of sex-bias, and strong significance, despite the ‘healthy volunteer’ selection bias of UKB participants, keep alive the future ambition of a blood-based biomarker panel for accurate ME diagnosis.
 

kushami

Senior Member
Messages
406
My summary:

Researchers found 116 differences in molecular and cellular blood traits between ME/CFS blood samples and healthy control blood samples taken from the UK Biobank.

These differences could not be used to say whether one person did or did not have ME/CFS, but were significant enough to clearly distinguish the two populations.

The 116 differences point to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and liver disease, among other things. None are connected to inactivity.
 

southwestforests

Senior Member
Messages
774
Location
Missouri
thanks for sharing but i cant believe we still talk about me/cfs about being a psych problem.
Indeed.

Dad and I were several days ago reviewing his experience of being diagnosed with ME/CFS in the mid 1980s by US Military doctors and psychiatrists in Virginia.

WAY BACK THEN the psychiatric doctors and medical doctors both said, declared, asserted,
SHOWED,
that ME/CFS
WAS NOT psychiatric/psychological in its origin.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT - IN THE 1980s !!!

And here 40 years later, FORTY YEARS LATER!!!, the civilian medical industrial establishment is STILL populated by a bunch of natural born arrogant idiots.

And I encounter them.

And it causes health care problems.

There is a lot said both positive and negative about military and specifically Veterans Administration, VA, health care.
And it is true that WW2 veteran Grandfather W had some bad experiences.
But, damn, sam, my Dad gets magnitudes, MAGNITUDES, better ME/CFS health care from the VA than I have EVER gotten from civilian doctors and paid for by Mediwedontcare and Medicaintnoaid.

Then again, he WAS their first medical retirement with that and fibromyalgia, so I suspect he is to this day something of a guinea pig and research subject.

Last I saw his medical records at a disability review hearing something like a decade back they were 3 feet thick from all the documentation of all the tests and investigations and treatments.

Last I saw my medical records before they went all electronic they were something like 3/8 an inch thick.

AND ...

Those military doctors have known, KNOWN, something was wrong with his blood all this time.
Last I heard a few months ago, they still do not know what exactly it is, or why it is, but they KNOW something in his blood is dysfunctional because there are tests which show it.

Well, this has gone down an unplanned path and turned in to something of a resentment laden rant.
Oh well, it is what it is.
And I am an unhappy camper who has been documentably harmed by supposed "health care".
And I resent that.
Really, really, really, resent that.
 
Last edited:
Back