GlassCannonLife
Senior Member
- Messages
- 819
I have been badly crashed for a few months now, which has meant I've been using 125-300 mg of pregnenolone to prop up my adrenal function along with a steady morning 8 mg hydrocortisone. My endocrinologist is a fan of pregnenolone as it doesn't cause adrenal suppression but helps a lot with the borderline insufficiency I get when I crash.
Over the last 5 or 6 weeks I've been tracking my intake of pregnenolone (I take it as-needed), and I've been slowly improving and needing less (aided also by IV vitamin c infusions that seem to be quite helpful). I had another flare up a week or so ago but I am finally starting to trend down in requirement.
Anyway not meaning to ramble on, but the rate of change is a little depressing but also made me wonder a few things:
- is this actually the rate at which I would be improving globally (not out of a crash) if I was to pace perfectly ie not trigger any symptom worsening or PEM? It is around maybe 1 point of the CFIDS Scale per month (if I don't flare up!)
- is there something different between crash recovery and overall global recovery? Why do we seem to reach these arbitrary "set points"? Or are they simply illusions but we immediately overdo things the instant we feel less symptomatic?
- I have seen some stories of people recovering substantially (or completely) from pacing over long periods of time (years). I couldn't find a recent poll here though.
I was hoping to use this thread to discuss your experiences with proper full blown successful pacing and its effects on recovery. I realise we all try to "pace" day to day ie not overdo it, but I am referring to the strict and highly specific style of pacing where you never (if possible) cause any symptomatic worsening over extended periods.
Please expand on your responses in posts as appropriate. Thank you!
Over the last 5 or 6 weeks I've been tracking my intake of pregnenolone (I take it as-needed), and I've been slowly improving and needing less (aided also by IV vitamin c infusions that seem to be quite helpful). I had another flare up a week or so ago but I am finally starting to trend down in requirement.
Anyway not meaning to ramble on, but the rate of change is a little depressing but also made me wonder a few things:
- is this actually the rate at which I would be improving globally (not out of a crash) if I was to pace perfectly ie not trigger any symptom worsening or PEM? It is around maybe 1 point of the CFIDS Scale per month (if I don't flare up!)
- is there something different between crash recovery and overall global recovery? Why do we seem to reach these arbitrary "set points"? Or are they simply illusions but we immediately overdo things the instant we feel less symptomatic?
- I have seen some stories of people recovering substantially (or completely) from pacing over long periods of time (years). I couldn't find a recent poll here though.
I was hoping to use this thread to discuss your experiences with proper full blown successful pacing and its effects on recovery. I realise we all try to "pace" day to day ie not overdo it, but I am referring to the strict and highly specific style of pacing where you never (if possible) cause any symptomatic worsening over extended periods.
Please expand on your responses in posts as appropriate. Thank you!