"A sad day for press freedom", says the Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Incompetent-doctors-secret-GMC-hearings.html
Fitness to practice hearings may in future take place in private, with press and public banned. It appears that the proposal is that the accused practitioners would have the option for a private hearing and presumably not all hearings would be secret. The rationale is that doctors shouldn't be exposed in the press in cases where they may eventually be found innocent.
I've linked to the Daily Mail here, because as far as I can tell from Google News, the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the Evening Standard were the only UK papers to cover this story. A familiar pattern here - lots of interesting stories are only reported in these sources, and Guardian readers, it seems, don't even need to know that this change has been proposed...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Incompetent-doctors-secret-GMC-hearings.html
Fitness to practice hearings may in future take place in private, with press and public banned. It appears that the proposal is that the accused practitioners would have the option for a private hearing and presumably not all hearings would be secret. The rationale is that doctors shouldn't be exposed in the press in cases where they may eventually be found innocent.
I've linked to the Daily Mail here, because as far as I can tell from Google News, the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the Evening Standard were the only UK papers to cover this story. A familiar pattern here - lots of interesting stories are only reported in these sources, and Guardian readers, it seems, don't even need to know that this change has been proposed...