Phylogenetic analysis of MLV sequences from longitudinally sampled Chronic Fatigue Sy

[ChuckG]

So where is the " Phylogenetic analysis of MLV sequences from longitudinally sampled Chronic Fatigue Sy" discussion?

Posts several paragraphs long, totally off-thread. Page after page. Attack. Counter attack. Counter-counter attack. etc

Usenet Newsgroups were almost worthless back in the day. Nothing much has changed.

Where is there a heavily moderated source of CFS/CIDFS/ME/XMRV information?

 

[alex3619]

Hi ChuckG, for the most part there is no discussion of the paper here because:

A. We were distracted by off topic arguments we felt had to be argued with.
B. The full paper is on another thread - this is not the real discussion.
C. The arguments against this paper this paper's (and for this paper's conclusions) have been made again and again on other threads, ad nauseum.
D. We are waiting for the Blood Working Groups interim findings, they are about to go public perhaps.

So not a lot was mentioned that was new, because this is essentially a rehash without the current facts - the critical thing at the moment is: What did the BWG find?

Bye,
Alex

 

[Firestormm]

So where is the " Phylogenetic analysis of MLV sequences from longitudinally sampled Chronic Fatigue Sy" discussion?

Posts several paragraphs long, totally off-thread. Page after page. Attack. Counter attack. Counter-counter attack. etc

Usenet Newsgroups were almost worthless back in the day. Nothing much has changed.

Where is there a heavily moderated source of CFS/CIDFS/ME/XMRV information?

The full paper is here: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/show...7-August-2011-Full-Text&highlight=katzourakis

Feel free to add your thoughts about the actual paper there if you like.