MeSci
ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
- Messages
- 8,235
- Location
- Cornwall, UK
I am fairly sure Daxor are wrong. Haematocrit is defined as red cell volume over total blood volume as measurable in a blood sample. Daxor seem to be trying to redefine the term so that they can sell their test. As far as I am aware the only significance of having more red cells to health is if the haematocrit (as originally defined) is high - which may precipitate thrombosis or embolism. The healthy feedback mechanism for red blood cell production will have to work on the basis of the true haematocrit - the bone marrow would not have receptors for total red cell mass. So a raised red cell mass that gave a normal haematocrit because of a raised plasma volume would be an indicator of a healthy bone marrow, not of polycythaemia.
Judging by the brochure this company is in to a hard sell - I would be sceptical.
I wondered this, so did a quick literature search, and found several papers reporting studies that used the Daxor, or reviewed the evidence on it, produced by researchers who did not reveal any conflicting interests - plus a few by people who clearly stated that they were involved with Daxor. Of course, they may have had undeclared interests, I suppose. Or the researchers may have been absolute shits (poetic licence
BTW I laughed so much at that typo that I almost became asthmatic and was having trouble using the keyboard.