Probably not important:
They didn't do this:
It is slightly odd they didn't report this. If one looks at:
part i (just above it):
They did report median and lower and upper quartile (i.e. IQR), so they could easily have done so in the same table which makes me wonder whether they wanted to hide it e.g. perhaps the figures for CBT or GET were different in some way.
They didn't report minimum and maximum for either (i) or (ii) either.
Therapy and other treatment received Summaries will be given of treatment received under the intervention policies; these will include:
[..]
ii) Median (lower and upper quartile, minimum and maximum) of proportion of telephone sessions per participant
They didn't do this:
(i.e. "Therapy sessions attended†" and "Specialist medical care sessions attended").†86% of sessions were received face-to-face and 14% by telephone. ‡94% of sessions were received face-to-face and 6% by telephone.
It is slightly odd they didn't report this. If one looks at:
part i (just above it):
i) SSMC and APT/CBT/GET received
a. Median (lower and upper quartile, minimum and maximum) number of SSMC sessions attended
b. Median (lower and upper quartile, minimum and maximum) number of APT/CBT/GET sessions
attended
They did report median and lower and upper quartile (i.e. IQR), so they could easily have done so in the same table which makes me wonder whether they wanted to hide it e.g. perhaps the figures for CBT or GET were different in some way.
They didn't report minimum and maximum for either (i) or (ii) either.