Places I'd rather be.
As the Lancet have been told repeatedly about other errors, they must be fully aware these exist. Didn't Mullan even concede to Hooper last year that the editorial will be corrected? The Lancet do not seem to care much about errors, is this in general or is it just towards PACE? I tried to get them to correct the erroneous claim that Hooper's complaint to the Lancet is available on Wikipedia, but it was deemed unnecessarily that any distinction should be made between the actual Wikipedia website vs the same MediaWiki software used on mecfsforums.com.