slayadragon
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,122
- Location
- twitpic.com/photos/SlayaDragon
I certainly think that if people are getting a lot of environmental toxin exposures (e.g. by living in a house with a lot of mold toxin or in an area with really problematic outdoor air), reducing or even eliminating toxins in the diet is likely not to provide much of a noticeable difference.
Undoubtedly it's only because I'm in a really clean environment that the elimination of dietary toxins made such a difference.
GMO labeling was defeated in California, but there now are ballot initiatives getting close in Washington and NM. This WSJ article makes it seem that Monsanto actually is going to end up negotiating it too.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323644904578272152056196778.html
My belief is that while avoiding non-organic produce is important, that is much less important than avoiding the toxins in Roundup contaminated things (which would be soy, corn, alfalfa, sorghum, canola and sugar beet -- or the flesh or milk of any animal that ate these things, e.g. all non-organic milk and meat). A lot of the pesticides in produce can be washed off, whereas the contamination of grain and milk/meat obviously cannot. (Though sprouting/soaking grain is generally a good thing.)
If I were thinking about putting some extra money toward less toxic food, I for sure would start with organic grains since those are pretty cheap and are really problematic when non-organic. Then I would do milk (still pretty cheap) and for sure eggs (which are really scary when non-organic and also pretty cheap). I don't think it's a good idea for CFS patients to eliminate all meat from their diets, but cutting way back and just eating organic (not humanely treated! that's not the same thing and in my opinion is a diversion to keep people from focusing on the real problem) may still be worth it. For produce, organic is pretty cheap at farmer's markets in summer. But if I found that I couldn't afford it, I would buy non-organic and then wash it really well using soap (diluted Dr. Bronner's Magic Soap, unscented).
Undoubtedly it's only because I'm in a really clean environment that the elimination of dietary toxins made such a difference.
GMO labeling was defeated in California, but there now are ballot initiatives getting close in Washington and NM. This WSJ article makes it seem that Monsanto actually is going to end up negotiating it too.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323644904578272152056196778.html
My belief is that while avoiding non-organic produce is important, that is much less important than avoiding the toxins in Roundup contaminated things (which would be soy, corn, alfalfa, sorghum, canola and sugar beet -- or the flesh or milk of any animal that ate these things, e.g. all non-organic milk and meat). A lot of the pesticides in produce can be washed off, whereas the contamination of grain and milk/meat obviously cannot. (Though sprouting/soaking grain is generally a good thing.)
If I were thinking about putting some extra money toward less toxic food, I for sure would start with organic grains since those are pretty cheap and are really problematic when non-organic. Then I would do milk (still pretty cheap) and for sure eggs (which are really scary when non-organic and also pretty cheap). I don't think it's a good idea for CFS patients to eliminate all meat from their diets, but cutting way back and just eating organic (not humanely treated! that's not the same thing and in my opinion is a diversion to keep people from focusing on the real problem) may still be worth it. For produce, organic is pretty cheap at farmer's markets in summer. But if I found that I couldn't afford it, I would buy non-organic and then wash it really well using soap (diluted Dr. Bronner's Magic Soap, unscented).