snowathlete
Senior Member
- Messages
- 5,374
- Location
- UK
They've not released the recovery data, and that's what will cause them the most trouble. If this was an attempt to get their presentation of pre-specified analyses out before others got the data they'd have included recovery outcomes imo. I think that this is an attempt to avoid some of the blow back from the scientific community that they're expecting when they appeal.
Hard to see this stopping blow back from science when the figures are so damning. I think they didn't do Recovery because those figures are even more damning. This is damage limitation (though a bit futile) in the hope that people see this and therefore the Recovery rates that follow will maybe pass them by - they'll think they've already seen the latest PACE news.