I was just pointing out what happens in real life when you are part of a decision making process that involves a group of people with differing views….
First let me tell you that if don't always agree with you, I am very grateful for the work you're doing, Charles.
But I really must tell you that I find the way you refer to "real life" whenever someone disagrees with you, very offensive when dealing with people that are deprieved of "real life" because of this terrible disease.
Some of us didn't get the chance to know what "real life" is because they were stuck by the illness too young. Does that mean their experience is less valuable?
And a lot of us have professional skills that haven't been erased because of the disease and perfectly know what it's like to work with people with different viewpoints.
And I've met in my professional life a lot of brainless people that didn't learn a lot from what you call "real life".
What did Esther Crawley and her lot learned from "real life", apart from skills to improve one's career?