Note that this paper is not peer reviewed or published
Not only is it not peer reviewed, it presents no methods so reliability of results can't be scrutinised, while results are given as a perfunctory summary - again they can't really be scrutinised.
In short it is not a scientific paper with any credibility, nor does the author appear to have any scientific background that I could find.
To me it has all the hallmarks of a scam. I'd need to see a lot more evidence to be convinced that there is anything to it.
Is next generation sequencing likely to show a bacterial infection like this?
The limiting factor for NGS revealing a low level pathogen (whether it be an L-form or non-L-form bacterium, virus or fungus) is the presence of much greater quantities of host DNA which can mask rare sequences.
Various techniques have been devised to overcome this technical problem and the technique is being increasingly applied to both pathogen hunting and to diagnosis of infections which defy all other identification techniques.
Here is a review which summarises the state of things a couple of years ago. It concludes :-
The question is probably not if, but rather when, WG-NGS (whole genome next generation sequencing) will become a routine test in diagnostics of infectious diseases. This development will require improvement in sample preparation, availability of sequencers in central laboratories and validated pipelines for read sorting and taxonomic assignation. There is no doubt that such an opportunity will sooner than later profoundly change the routine laboratory practice together with the means of conducting microbiological diagnosis.
Here is a study from around the same time showing comparison of existing methods for detecting pathogens in blood.
Here is an editorial which summarises pros and cons and shows that the technique has been successful for detecting a novel virus as a cause of encephalitis.
Here is a more detailed review of its application to discovery of new viruses.
Here is a case study showing the identification of a spirochete (
Leptospira) as a cause of an otherwise unidentifiable meningo-encephalitis.
These are just examples to illustrate applicability. Advances are being made all the time which will undoubtedly result in this becoming a standard diagnostic.