alex3619
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,810
- Location
- Logan, Queensland, Australia
Hi everyone. Several have commented that this is a question of fact, not opinion, or something to that effect.
I concur with that. XMRV either is or is not real. I think we already have the answer to that - it is real.
XMRV either is or is not in most ME/CFS patients. I will only be convinced that it is not present if they start doing biopsies and stop using nested PCR as the primary tool.
XMRV either is or is not causing ME/CFS, whether directly or indirectly. This will be the tough one, I think if it is causal we will prove it by successfully treating us long before we fully understand the pathology.
These issues are a matter of fact. The science is about finding what the facts are, and failed investigations are much more likely than successful ones when operating at the limits of current technology.
Bye
Alex
I concur with that. XMRV either is or is not real. I think we already have the answer to that - it is real.
XMRV either is or is not in most ME/CFS patients. I will only be convinced that it is not present if they start doing biopsies and stop using nested PCR as the primary tool.
XMRV either is or is not causing ME/CFS, whether directly or indirectly. This will be the tough one, I think if it is causal we will prove it by successfully treating us long before we fully understand the pathology.
These issues are a matter of fact. The science is about finding what the facts are, and failed investigations are much more likely than successful ones when operating at the limits of current technology.
Bye
Alex