Thanks - I was looking at one on the NT (?) site that had beetroot in it for colouring, which put the knackers on that for me (causes migraines). So much to be careful about!
Yeah, a lot of other filler in it as well.
Thanks - I was looking at one on the NT (?) site that had beetroot in it for colouring, which put the knackers on that for me (causes migraines). So much to be careful about!
Thanks - I was looking at one on the NT (?) site that had beetroot in it for colouring, which put the knackers on that for me (causes migraines). So much to be careful about!
I must say I was a bit perplexed by some of Hornigs statements, I kinda prefer the more modest approach by Fluge&Mella. Unless they know something we don`t (as they might), i rather have studies speak for themselves.
I was a bit puzzled too. She may have been paraphrased a bit. I don't think we have any published studies on lipid replacement. Looking at the sites where it is highlighted I am very unimpressed. Mitochondria may turn out to be important but I don't think we know that yet.
That has been discussed on the boards several times. Why don't you do a search? No controls, subjective fatigue measures plus the supplement used is full of other ingredients like vitamins etc. Don't know why anyone would find this interesting.I found this but haven't had time to read it yet:
http://www.immed.org/publications/nicolson_elllithorpejcfs_copy.pdf
It may be one of those things that's maybe worth a punt while waiting for the big guns to come in - because rituximab and so on still seem to be several years away. Or maybe not! Need to do some more reading but it's sometimes better just to give a thing a try, as long as it looks harmless at worst (though always starting cautiously with small doses, as ever).
That has been discussed on the boards several times. No controls, subjective fatigue measures plus the supplement used is full of other ingredients like vitamins etc. Don't know why anyone would find this interesting.
Funny - think it may just be me. I don't view that as saying patients should try this. She says "some patients" I think she is highlighting different types more than anything and that it isn't expressed as an intentional recommendation.The bit I bolded in my first post.
Funny - think it may just be me. I don't view that as saying patients should try this. She says "some patients" I think she is highlighting different types more than anything and that it isn't expressed as an intentional recommendation.
I find it very strange all round though, because I've never even heard of this either and maybe it's something she is hearing from clinicians.
I don't know if it's available on Amazon UK. I get it on iHerb:
http://www.iherb.com/Nutricology-NT-Factor-EnergyLipids-Chewables-60-Chewable-Tablets/49283
I use this particular version of the NT Factor because it doesn't have the added "mitochondrial supplements" which are much too stimulating for me and make me really sick. But it's very expensive + delivery + customs (for those of us in the EU) so I'm not sure if it would be worth your while.
Damage to cell membranes is normally caused by ROS. PWME are probably better off taking vitamin E than lecithin:In normal humans, damaged cells and mitochondria would just commit autophagy and then heal. Something is preventing that in CFS. I don't think it is nutrition. It is either ongoing damage, or some sort of nutrient block.
Lipid replacement therapy would be nice if we could trigger a healing process.
Ah, ok. I actually looked at the Tablets, only 30 day suppy, not 60 days like Chewable stuff. Are the concentrations the same? Chewable supplements seem to be more expensive typicaylly, but not in this case?
GG
http://www.iherb.com/Nutricology-NT-Factor-Advanced-Physicians-Formula-150-Tablets/45695
In normal humans, damaged cells and mitochondria would just commit autophagy and then heal. Something is preventing that in CFS. I don't think it is nutrition. It is either ongoing damage, or some sort of nutrient block
Certainly one would not recommend lipid replacement for peope who are 50-100 lbs overweight ?!?I was a bit puzzled too. She may have been paraphrased a bit. I don't think we have any published studies on lipid replacement. Looking at the sites where it is highlighted I am very unimpressed. Mitochondria may turn out to be important but I don't think we know that yet.
GG, you're looking at one with added ingredients. Here's one with just the phospholipids, it's cheaper:
http://www.iherb.com/Nutricology-NT-Factor-EnergyLipids-Chewables-60-Chewable-Tablets/49283
Nutricology is good, you could also try, LEF, they're good as well but it only has one of the phospholipids:
http://www.iherb.com/Life-Extension-PS-Caps-100-mg-100-Veggie-Caps/47814
Certainly one would not recommend lipid replacement for peope who are 50-100 lbs overweight ?!?
Just the one lipid, phosphatidylserine, helped me drastically when my brain was at it's worst. It took me from not being able to read or concentrate at all to being able to read for short periods. I'd like to try this Nutricology one, with all those other phospholipids.
One tablet of that chewable NT Factor I linked to contains less than a gram of phospholipids. It's not going to make people fat at least. But as adreno said, it makes little sense to keep supplying the phospholipids if they're just going to keep getting mangled by ROS.
Same here with the chewables, back in 2014 when I couldn't concentrate for even 30 seconds. It was as if the lights came on. After a while I stopped noticing further benefits. It gave that initial boost in brain fog and muscle weakness but after that nothing. I would call it a very minor but noticeable effect. Still, for someone who is totally bedridden and can't even read a book, as I was back then, it could be the difference between life being tolerable vs. intolerable.