BrightCandle
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,197
A lack of independent clinical scrutiny leaves the door open for lawyers to put the reputation of the health service above patient safety
This is something I felt accutely as the evidence base was almost entirely the NHS and local authority defending itself putting its version of events forward. In this case we had Dr Weir involved with alternative plans but since that was completely dismissed and he wasn't allowed near the patient I wonder what weight the coroner will put on his expertise. The coroner learnt some about ME but not from the doctors, almost exclusively from Sarah and somewhat Dr Weir. In ME's case the expertise is all with the patients, even our allied doctors are often have big gaps in the extent of their knowledge of the symptoms and impact of the disease.
I guess we will find out in a few months(!) what the ruling is and whether Dr Weir and Sarah's testimony is enough to challenge the NHS's version of events. I think the doctors repeatedly betrayed their statements that they didn't know whether ME was Psychological in the way they behaved with Maeve, what they did and tried to push and also their language around her "believing she couldn't...". This language is the sort of thing as an ME patients we are acutely tuned to, we are used to it from doctors but will the coroner pick it up as the subtle lie they all told about what they were told to say by their lawyers about knowledge of the disease. Shouldn't the fact that even now none of those doctors can list the definition of the disease and its diagnosis be a good sign that actually lack of knowledge did impact things and still would?
I worry, having seen the accounts of the pre-inquest too I am not sure what the Coroner believed then and does now about the systemic nature of the problem and how this impacted on the case. Sarah did an admirable job getting this into the case as did Sean but it really fell entirely on the parents to present this side of the case and its not got the same authority behind it as a result, they couldn't call an authority on it who wasn't involved in Maeve's care and that feels unbalanced to me. Who would you call on the systemic issues other than charities or maybe an MP?