ME/CFS Research: Herpes Autoimmune Spectrum Disorder

Status
Not open for further replies.

Martin aka paused||M.E.

Senior Member
Messages
2,291
.


I agree with Dr Davis on this. From what we’ve also observed - achieving “symptomatic remission only”, in a HHV-infected person that isn’t already altered by various pharmaceuticals and doesn’t have confounding co-infections may be rapid.

What do you mean with „altered“. Almost everyone here has tried many supplements ands drugs.

what do you say to the autoimmunity-trigger of your Protocol?
Are you in contact with Professor Davis on your protocol? If yes: How did he react.

Professor Jonathan Edwards called your paper “pseudoscience” and that you mushed together things that doesn't fit together and that you made immunological mistakes in what you've written. What do you think about such an accuse?

In a private conversation you sent text messages of ppl who feel slightly better. But some of them where obviously mild (can go to work) or it’s nothing special you haven't read since years here on PR with „I found a supplement that helps“. I didn’t see those acclaimed remissions.

if it was so easy to bring cells into apoptosis - congrats, you solved cancer :)

My questions seem to be harsh, but I don't see any results here. This disease underlies fluctuations. It's normal that you're better one day and worse the other day.

I'm on your protocol. So I ask out of interest!

Thank you so much in advance

Martin.

@Push Fwd
 

Reading_Steiner

Senior Member
Messages
245
Its true that fluctuations could be coincidental, you have to apply experience. I had the impression for example that my body was really stretched thin in the past few monthes ( after 5 years of being ill and some progression last year ), I had headaches, dry skin on my back, frequent minor crashes, antisocial mood / hypersensitivity etc. Before starting the protocol I was in a bad way for a few weeks and I felt like it was just going to get slowly worse over the next month or so. Its true that i'm not in remission and I didn't get the intense fever for as long as I was supposed to, but most things that were supposed to happen did happen, and I will take any slight improvements over doing nothing.
 

jump44

Senior Member
Messages
122
Not saying anything about the potential of this being a cure but I’ve been reading thes forum for a long time and johnathan edwards disregards anything that doesn’t fall within his view of things.”science” is constantly evolving , his views appear very static. Just had to get that off my chest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

5vforest

Senior Member
Messages
273
I'll wade in again...

Forget what Professor Edwards says. Is there *anyone* with a medical degree who can attest to the validity of this treatment protocol and the associated "research papers"?

I will readily admit that Joshua has assembled an impressive amount of information in his papers and protocol. I also appreciate the merits of self-learning and approaching a problem with "outside of the box" thinking. I'm just not really sure that this works as well in medical science as it does in computer science. The difference being that computers and software programs behave exactly as they are programmed to behave. The same cannot be said for biology; there is such a large element of the unknown / undiscovered.

As an example: something I have learned from reading forums such as this one is that most research papers cannot be taken at face value. That is, plenty of published research is unvalidated, or incomplete, or just plain wrong, and will never make it into the textbooks. As an outsider it is very difficult to know where an idea lands on this scale, especially if one lacks a formal background in medical science.

So if you create a theory that cobbles together ideas from X number of published papers, you are probably basing your theory on many things which will turn out to be untrue.

While it is a nice idea to have a unifying theory of illness for ME/CFS, nearly everyone agrees that we are not there yet, nor are we even close. Thus, the onus is on the person making large claims of understanding and curing multiple illnesses to demonstrate their validity.

I am glad that folks feel comfortable experimenting with supplements, but this is unlikely to tell us anything one way or the other. If anyone (whether they are Joshua, Ron Davis, or the Lightning Process people) truly thinks that they have a cure, then they will demonstrate it with science so that it will have the maximal impact on folks living with this disease.

The only thing that would convince me to take this seriously is if the papers were actually peer-reviewed, or if there was a genuine trial of the suggested protocol.

Until then, I wish the best to anyone experimenting with these supplements, and I will also urge them to be cautious as it sounds like there have already been adverse effects for some.
 

geraldt52

Senior Member
Messages
603
Not saying anything about the potential of this being a cure but I’ve been reading thes forum for a long time and johnathan edwards disregards anything that doesn’t fall within his view of things.
While I've had my differences with Dr. Edwards attitudes, his background and past accomplishments lead me to not take his opinions lightly. He warned early on that Rituxan was likely not going to be the answer and wouldn't stand up to the scrutiny of double blind study. It didn't, and the placebo leg actually outperformed the Rituxan leg of the trial...also calling into question patient reports of "improvement" that are not based on a clear biomarker.

There's a reason why supplement manufacturers don't do even small, informal double blind studies of their supplements...because they know what the results will be.
 

jump44

Senior Member
Messages
122
While I've had my differences with Dr. Edwards attitudes, his background and past accomplishments lead me to not take his opinions lightly. He warned early on that Rituxan was likely not going to be the answer and wouldn't stand up to the scrutiny of double blind study. It didn't, and the placebo leg actually outperformed the Rituxan leg of the trial...also calling into question patient reports of "improvement" that are not based on a clear biomarker.

There's a reason why supplement manufacturers don't do even small, informal double blind studies of their supplements...because they know what the results will be.

that’s fine. I literally never saw him one time give any credence to anything that even slightly deviated from the by the book approach. No one is saying not to be discerning. But if cfs patients hung on a guy like this every word and followed his line of reasoning you may have a viable treatment by the year 2090 when a potential drug is finally in phase 2 trials. I am the biggest opponent of “false hope” there is however such thinking will just make one scared to do anything to potentially help themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
What do you mean with „altered“. Almost everyone here has tried many supplements ands drugs.
Hi Martin!

In this case, I’m referring to continuing with contraindicated medications during the use of this protocol, such as gabapentin and drugs which affect NMDA, like valcyte -

50BBE647-D7ED-4CC3-9261-4794D7CF803D.jpeg


Ammonia has similar interactions.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8845943/

Having said that, I’m currently exploring the logic behind why 3 people have a pattern whereby they have active coxsackie infections and in 2 cases, their historical symptoms started upon discontinuing a SSRI. The third person has also used a SSRI. They’ve also mentioned historically observing temporary benefits from dopamine modifying drugs. This points to sustained alterations around NMDA.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/94982264.pdf


what do you say to the autoimmunity-trigger of your Protocol?
I haven’t seen that demonstrated at all.

The literature shows (and all observed, repeatable reports have also shown) a direct causal effect of reishi’s triterpenes and beta-glucans and an immune response that targets lytic and latent cells.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585879/

The immune activity reportedly stops when the beta-glucans are suspended.

The mechanism here is that normally, only lytic cells are detected and replaced by the immune system. This is the key reason why these viruses evade detection and have been so difficult to eliminate.

As the latent cells are now able to signal for apoptosis, providing mTOR / GDH is also normalised, this presents a much larger array of targets for the immune system to remediate.

Someone who has eg. VZV (like my father, who started on the protocol a week ago for bowel cancer and shingles) will not have a particulary pleasant time with this, as the inflammation causes pain, however people with VZV have been reporting that dosing the beta-glucans periodically (oat bran, lions mane), eg. morning only, while also using topical lignocaine allows the immune response to abate sufficiently to allow normal / comfortable sleep. By all reports, the immune activity continues to spread throughout the nervous system / skin and areas which have seen activity are not continuously targeted.

My view on autoimmunity is that they relate to the hundreds of viral antigens being produced by these infections and that the body’s immune system (which is normally quite capable of identifying and not attacking eg. symbiotic bacteria in the right places), isn’t silly enough to attack itself under normal circumstances.. however the viral antigens may provide a direct mechanism for this activity:

https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/7/11/ofaa468/5919166

https://www.science.org.au/curious/people-medicine/epstein-barr-virus

We’ve seen situations now where a “zero” real-time PCR test for EBV, CMV correlated with “zero” results for autoimmune antibodies being tested, however this needs further testing. This was relating to off-label spironolactone.



Are you in contact with Professor Davis on your protocol? If yes: How did he react.
I have enjoyed some infrequent, yet very down-to-earth video chats with Janet. Ron is *really* busy, however has started reading my papers. I haven’t been in contact with Janet for a couple of weeks, although we intend to catch up when Ron has finished reading through them. I really look forward to that next conversation.

Professor Jonathan Edwards called your paper “pseudoscience” and that you mushed together things that doesn't fit together and that you made immunological mistakes in what you've written. What do you think about such an accuse?
I haven’t seen any updated comments from Jon since he looked at my first paper. I’m not aware of anything relating to the second or third paper. My experience over at S4ME has been very, very different to the one here, so I haven’t been participating much.

What I will say is that we’ve been contacted by, and are in regular discussions with, a number of amazing researchers and clinicians. Some clinicians have requested our cooperation in using our methods in practice and they’ll be writing additional case reports. We’re seeing community support at all levels and a high amount of interest -

819BE156-FFC6-4031-A147-4EA13A885E52.jpeg

A39F04B2-DC78-4D09-814D-7653E4279E0A.jpeg

8EE6B0EF-A073-4CC2-B4AB-64B5028F9CA2.png


In a private conversation you sent text messages of ppl who feel slightly better. But some of them where obviously mild (can go to work) or it’s nothing special you haven't read since years here on PR with „I found a supplement that helps“. I didn’t see those acclaimed remissions.
Where I’ve asked and been given permission, I’ve publically shared some people’s “thank you” messages where they’re now getting through normal life without PEM, etc.

My observation is that the key difference between “mild CFS” and “severe CFS” is the diet being consumed.

High carbohydrate diets create a downward spiral effect of cyclical pain / deterioration that pushes someone towards feeding tube usage.

This complicates things further, as every medical nutrition / feeding tube compatible product I’ve subsequently reviewed over the last 2 months has the exact OPPOSITE macros needed to pull someone back from that form of personal hell. They’re low protein (<50g), very high net carbohydrate diets, eg. 350g net carbs from maltodextrin per day.

In a model that is based on elevated GDH and impaired a-KGDH, this will lead to someone being trapped in this state.

The ongoing ROS and depletion of Acetyl-CoA prevents beta-oxidation, creates dysautonomia and creates energy deficits, oxalates, neurological disorders, etc.

The HIF alterations lead to tissue maintenance problems, collagen synthesis issues, cancers, etc.

LDL increase from EBV creates more platelet activating factor (PAF). High levels of PAF degrades the skin barrier and causes mast cell issues, etc. Acetyl-CoA depletion breaks acetylhydrolase (the enzyme responsible for metabolising PAF to lysoPAF). This may also lead to allergies, intolerances and chronic unpleasantness.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ing_platelet-activating_factor_in_anaphylaxis

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0394632015600598

https://www.researchgate.net/public...or_PAF_Acetylhydrolase_and_Severe_Anaphylaxis

It also turns out there is some additional modelling we can use here for something called “hyperinsulinism and hyperammonemia syndrome”, where they partially describe how high GDH causes the ROS, insulin homeostasis and ammonia issues we’ve also been describing. Variations on some of these studies will relate to GLUD1 alterations only, whereas we’re looking at GLUD1, GLUD2.

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/86/4/1782/2848852

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29943084/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11518822/


if it was so easy to bring cells into apoptosis - congrats, you solved cancer :)
Thank you, that was my interpretation also. We’ve had reports from HIV positive people with similarly positive results. We’ll be including a HIV group in the upcoming trial, along with a number of cancer cohorts.

My questions seem to be harsh, but I don't see any results here. This disease underlies fluctuations. It's normal that you're better one day and worse the other day.
Well, the good part about this is that we can demonstrate the robustness of this model without inducing the immune response (which significantly confounds energy levels, symptoms) very easily.

Depending on which mechanism is used, this is still expected to create roughly 4 days of really unpleasant ammonia dumping (big crash/headache/PEM) from the purine nucleotide cycle being restored. This “dump” may be partially ameliorated by ongoing conversion to hippurate.

I'm on your protocol. So I ask out of interest!

Thank you so much in advance

Martin.
Thank you for your trust in my research.

We’re in the process of organising a pilot study / trial, primarily here in Australia (multiple countries = multiple HREC, duplicate costs).

Funds allowing (I’m currently sponsoring this trial), we’ll have cohorts of 10-20 people for each of the diseases being tested against. This may end up being 800-1000 people. This is Aline’s area of expertise.

There are still logistical details to work through, including challenges with availability of specific lab tests due to Covid. We’re also working through the fun task of materials supply chain and validation / testing - reishi triterpenes being a key concern.

Aline has also just flown back to Germany for a family emergency, so this may add some additional challenges.

If you have any questions regarding specific details of the protocol, please feel free to reach out to me here or privately, as you see appropriate. I will do my best to help answer any enquiries.
 
Last edited:

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
I'll wade in again...

Forget what Professor Edwards says. Is there *anyone* with a medical degree who can attest to the validity of this treatment protocol and the associated "research papers"?

I will readily admit that Joshua has assembled an impressive amount of information in his papers and protocol. I also appreciate the merits of self-learning and approaching a problem with "outside of the box" thinking. I'm just not really sure that this works as well in medical science as it does in computer science. The difference being that computers and software programs behave exactly as they are programmed to behave. The same cannot be said for biology; there is such a large element of the unknown / undiscovered.

As an example: something I have learned from reading forums such as this one is that most research papers cannot be taken at face value. That is, plenty of published research is unvalidated, or incomplete, or just plain wrong, and will never make it into the textbooks. As an outsider it is very difficult to know where an idea lands on this scale, especially if one lacks a formal background in medical science.

So if you create a theory that cobbles together ideas from X number of published papers, you are probably basing your theory on many things which will turn out to be untrue.

While it is a nice idea to have a unifying theory of illness for ME/CFS, nearly everyone agrees that we are not there yet, nor are we even close. Thus, the onus is on the person making large claims of understanding and curing multiple illnesses to demonstrate their validity.

I am glad that folks feel comfortable experimenting with supplements, but this is unlikely to tell us anything one way or the other. If anyone (whether they are Joshua, Ron Davis, or the Lightning Process people) truly thinks that they have a cure, then they will demonstrate it with science so that it will have the maximal impact on folks living with this disease.

The only thing that would convince me to take this seriously is if the papers were actually peer-reviewed, or if there was a genuine trial of the suggested protocol.

Until then, I wish the best to anyone experimenting with these supplements, and I will also urge them to be cautious as it sounds like there have already been adverse effects for some.
I agree with the need for the concomitant matching level of evidence to support this type of research, or any other research.

Everything I’ve described needs to be fully tested and validated in accordance with normal processes / expectations. I’ve made a lot of connections. These all need to be tested and proven.

We’ve been preparing for the clinical trial and so far, this part is progressing well.

Owing to the nature of how this process usually works, it’s going to be a while before the required level of evidence is available, however I’m committed to making it happen.
 

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
Currently in a bit of an ugly decline, feels like an ME protracted crash. Muscles sort of ache and hurt in and around the knee and into the thigh. Feel dizzy, energy is ok but not far off low. Muscles tiring easily.

So to try to figure this out I am increasing EGCG up to 125mg from about 100mg trialled yesterday to see the effect. Originally 75mg was actually promoting seemingly a block on fatigue, however the body appeared to correct against that (correction the ME seemed to correct against that) meaning 75mg wasn't enough, hence the increase to 125mg egcg. 100mg yesterday didn't seem to have a huge effect.

One other issue I've been struggling with the last week is mild asthma, it comes and goes and it's nothing like air hunger it's totally different. Could just be due to the pollen and an interaction with the stuff I am taking, but it's there.

Rest of the info is on my latest blog post.
Sounds similar to what most people report for periods of immune response. If there’s doubt, removing beta-glucans for a suitable period of time will be expected to decrease that response.
 
Messages
14
Thought I was better, so continued with exercise, and then forgot to take two rounds of supplements (EGCG, LOLA, etc.....) have crashed not extreme but wokeup inflamed, dazed, blocked sinus, inflamed spine, headache and unfocused. Definitely not in a good mood.
 

Boba

Senior Member
Messages
332
@joshua.leisk sorry if this has been asked before. Yo mentioned that you had ME. Have you been officially diagnosed? Have you been mild or moderate? Did you suffer from PEM? I‘m watching this thread and find it quite interesting. Even if I don‘t quite understand the mechanisms etc. What is the effect on brain inflammation?
Thanks in advance for your answer
 

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
@joshua.leisk sorry if this has been asked before. Yo mentioned that you had ME. Have you been officially diagnosed? Have you been mild or moderate? Did you suffer from PEM? I‘m watching this thread and find it quite interesting. Even if I don‘t quite understand the mechanisms etc. What is the effect on brain inflammation?
Thanks in advance for your answer
Back when I had CFS/ME (mid 1990s), there wasn’t really a name or an official diagnosis criteria. We just got told some sometimes people who got “glandular fever” sometimes suffered from “chronic fatigue” and took a really long time to recover, or sometimes never did.

I went from being a really active, happy teenager one day to “mono”, followed by “severe” CFS/ME for a few months and then a long grind over 2 years with the usual cycle / set of symptoms. I made very gradual improvements and eventually escaped.

There’s a bit more of a background here - https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/herpes-autoimmune-spectrum-disorder-cfs-me-researcher.83357/

I wouldn’t wish my CFS/ME experience on anyone.. yet in present company, I’m the “lucky one”.. so I’m trying to now “give back”, in thanks for the life I’ve lived. People shouldn’t ever have to suffer through this.

The brain inflammation is hepatic encephalopathy, in this model.
 

Boba

Senior Member
Messages
332
Thanks for the detailed answer. I‘m suffering from heavy limbs and muscle twitching in PEM. There‘s a clear effect on my muscles. I think some neuroinflammation is involved as well. All of that came after covid. My theory is That HSV 1+2 or HPV are involved. Could be autoimmune as well. I have an autoimmune disease (Hashimoto). I would rate myself as severe/moderate. Can be upright doing stuff for 1-2h per day. Do you think the Protocol is applicable to me as well?
 

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
Thanks for the detailed answer. I‘m suffering from heavy limbs and muscle twitching in PEM. There‘s a clear effect on my muscles. I think some neuroinflammation is involved as well. All of that came after covid. My theory is That HSV 1+2 or HPV are involved. Could be autoimmune as well. I have an autoimmune disease (Hashimoto). I would rate myself as severe/moderate. Can be upright doing stuff for 1-2h per day. Do you think the Protocol is applicable to me as well?
I can’t offer medical advice, however there are a number of people already self-experimenting on the protocol with hashimotos, HSV-1/2 and HPV.

One of those people was the same person mentioned above, who is currently in week 9 of symptomatic remission.

There are also people just starting now / about to start with “long covid”. I’m looking forward to seeing how people with “long covid” respond - if my suspicions are correct, they will have a similar journey to everyone else.

Feel free to reach out via private message, or here, if you want any help / have any questions about the protocol, or products involved.

As you’ll see from previous posts, reishi quality between brands has been very problematic and similarly, supplement doses, schedule and diet are sensitive levers. This may get easier, over time.

Here’s a generic diet example - minor variations of this have been successfully used by some people already, after the initial “rather low carb” “ROS reset” phase is complete.

Macro targets here are approximately 1:1:1. Variations for specific intolerances, allergies, vegetarian diets, oxalate concerns, etc., are also quite possible.

You’d need to temporarily replace the breakfast oats, if you’re needing to take a break from beta-glucans / immune response, while still avoiding grains:

259F6413-22CC-4E1D-8EAC-B0036927C85B.jpeg
 

Martin aka paused||M.E.

Senior Member
Messages
2,291
Not saying anything about the potential of this being a cure but I’ve been reading thes forum for a long time and johnathan edwards disregards anything that doesn’t fall within his view of things.”science” is constantly evolving , his views appear very static. Just had to get that off my chest..
What you say about Edwards is not wrong but a bit jarsh
 

godlovesatrier

Senior Member
Messages
2,612
Location
United Kingdom
@joshua.leisk are you able to tell us more about the 9 week remission person?

Are they doing graded exercise at the 9 week point? At what day/week did they first see remission? Was it consistent or a very bumpy ride for the first month or two?

How long they have had ME? Did they have a medical diagnosis from a doctor?

Finally how severe were they beforehand? Ballparks: 1. worked full time but with difficulty, 2. housebound or 3. bedbound.

Thanks,
 

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
Thank you! I will give it a bit more thought and decide. As mentioned I don’t understand the mechanisms. Really appreciate the time you’re taking here to discuss and support.
You’re welcome. You may find these posts helpful -

Overview of the 3 papers:
https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/me-cfs-research-herpes-autoimmune-spectrum-disorder.83371/post-2337748

Primary mechanism, reflex, cascade:
https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/me-cfs-research-herpes-autoimmune-spectrum-disorder.83371/post-2335821

Continued..
https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/me-cfs-research-herpes-autoimmune-spectrum-disorder.83371/post-2338990
 

Martin aka paused||M.E.

Senior Member
Messages
2,291
Hi Martin!

My view on autoimmunity is that they relate to the hundreds of viral antigens being produced by these infections and that the body’s immune system (which is normally quite capable of identifying and not attacking eg. symbiotic bacteria in the right places), isn’t silly enough to attack itself under normal circumstances.. however the viral antigens may provide a direct mechanism for this activitY

AI can be triggered by bacteria, trauma, psychosis....

My observation is that the key difference between “mild CFS” and “severe CFS” is ...

No, that's not the case. I was mild for several years and could eat what I want. The second tube came when I was on a very strict keto diet.
 

joshua.leisk

Joshua Leisk (Researcher)
Messages
232
Location
Sydney, Australia
@joshua.leisk are you able to tell us more about the 9 week remission person?

Are they doing graded exercise at the 9 week point? At what day/week did they first see remission? Was it consistent or a very bumpy ride for the first month or two?

How long they have had ME? Did they have a medical diagnosis from a doctor?

Finally how severe were they beforehand? Ballparks: 1. worked full time but with difficulty, 2. housebound or 3. bedbound.

Thanks,
This gentleman is using a simplified version of the v2.x protocol. This means symptomatic remission only / no specific immune response function, beyond some additional butyrate, or spironolactone (with a prescription from your doctor). This happens with much less of a bumpy start, however for all of the reasons I’ve described, it’s the wrong approach.

I’ll have a chat with him and see if he’d like to come answer some questions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back